Cited by 31Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Pathological gambling: Influence of quality of life and psychological distress on abstinence after cognitive-behavioral inpatient treatment

Sander, Wiebke, Peters, Anne·2009·Journal of Gambling Studies

Abstract

The aim of this study is to understand the influence of psychological distress and quality of life on the maintenance of therapy success during a 1 year follow-up in pathological gamblers after inpatient cognitive-behavioral treatment. In a sample of 281 pathological gamblers (247 men, 34 women) the following measures were taken: psychological distress (beginning and end of treatment, and follow up), quality of life and abstinence from gambling. The results showed that relapsed pathological gamblers suffer of higher psychological distress at discharge and of lower quality of life during follow-up than abstinent gamblers. In a mediator analysis the causal relations between the three variables could be clarified: psychological distress has an impact on abstinence during follow-up, and quality of life can be considered a mediator variable for the relation between psychological distress and abstinence from pathological gambling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10899-009-9128-x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each of these studies found promising results consistent with the substance abuse literature, with post-treatment gambling frequency, post-treatment social support and post-treatment psychological distress and quality of life significantly associated with treatment outcomes at follow-up evaluations.

    “Each of these studies found promising results consistent with the substance abuse literature, with post-treatment gambling frequency (Dowling, 2009), post-treatment social support (Petry & Weiss, 2009) and post-treatment psychological distress and quality of life (Sander & Peters, 2009) significantly associated with treatment outcomes at follow-up evaluations.”
  • There are several studies that examine the influence of post-treatment client characteristics on follow-up treatment outcomes.

    “there are several studies that examine the influence of post-treatment client characteristics on follow-up treatment outcomes (Dowling, 2009;Petry & Weiss, 2009;Sander & Peters, 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sander, W., & Peters, A.
Affiliations
Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Sander, Wiebke
Venue
Journal of Gambling Studies
Published
2009-04-09
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
253-262
ISSN
  • 1050-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3602
OpenAlex
W2055393925
Cited by
31
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gambling Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
gambling addiction, quality of life, psychological distress, relapse, cognitive behavioral therapy, inpatient care, maintenance of treatment effects, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gambling, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Self Care, Social Environment, Social Support, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Behavior, Addictive, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review