Cited by 94Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDigital Mental Health InterventionsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

A Therapy System for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Using a Virtual Agent and Virtual Storytelling to Reconstruct Traumatic Memories

Open access
Tielman, Myrthe L., Neerincx, Mark A., Bidarra, Rafael, Kybartas, Ben, Brinkman, Willem-Paul·2017·Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract

Although post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is well treatable, many people do not get the desired treatment due to barriers to care (such as stigma and cost). This paper presents a system that bridges this gap by enabling patients to follow therapy at home. A therapist is only involved remotely, to monitor progress and serve as a safety net. With this system, patients can recollect their memories in a digital diary and recreate them in a 3D WorldBuilder. Throughout the therapy, a virtual agent is present to inform and guide patients through the sessions, employing an ontology-based question module for recollecting traumatic memories to further elicit a detailed memory recollection. In a usability study with former PTSD patients (n = 4), these questions were found useful for memory recollection. Moreover, the usability of the whole system was rated positively. This system has the potential to be a valuable addition to the spectrum of PTSD treatments, offering a novel type of home therapy assisted by a virtual agent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-017-0771-y

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have demonstrated that chatbot interventions improve psychological difficulties including major depressive disorder, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, antipsychotic medication adherence, and perceived stress.

    “Previous studies have demonstrated that chatbot interventions improve psychological difficulties including major depressive disorder [15], panic disorder [16], posttraumatic stress disorder [17], antipsychotic medication adherence [18], and perceived stress [19].”

    From A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Chatbot (Otis) for Health Anxiety Management: Mixed Methods Pilot Study (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    Citation [17] is attached to posttraumatic stress disorder, not the other conditions in the sentence. The Evaluation’s second usability test reports that four former PTSD patients found the virtual-agent system’s questions useful for recalling traumatic memories. It does not demonstrate that the intervention improved PTSD symptoms; the reported outcomes concern recollection and usability. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]van den Steen, M., Brinkman, W.-P., Vermetten, E. and Neerincx, M.,Design and Usability Evaluation of a Multi-Modal Memory Restructuring System for the treatment of combat-related PTSD," in ECCE 2010 Workshop on Cognitive Engineering for Technology in Mental Health Care and Rehabilitation, 2010.
  2. [33]J. Brooke, SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale, P. Jordan, B. Thomas, I. McClelland and B. Weerdmeester, Eds., Taylor & Francis, 1996, pp. 189–194.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tielman, M. L., Neerincx, M. A., Bidarra, R., Kybartas, B., & Brinkman, W.-P.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Tielman, Myrthe L.
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2017-07-11
Volume
41
Issue
8
Pages
125-125
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W2734969743
Cited by
94
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (314-99-104)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, virtual agents, virtual storytelling, memory reconstruction, home-based therapy, remote therapy, digital diaries, barriers to care, PTSD treatment
MeSH terms
Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review