Cited by 290Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a systematic review of process-and-outcome studies

Open access
Meyerbröker, Katharina, Emmelkamp, Paul M.G.·2010·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

In recent years, virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) has become an interesting alternative for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Research has focused on the efficacy of VRET in treating anxiety disorders: phobias, panic disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. In this systematic review, strict methodological criteria are used to give an overview of the controlled trials regarding the efficacy of VRET in patients with anxiety disorders. Furthermore, research into process variables such as the therapeutic alliance and cognitions and enhancement of therapy effects through cognitive enhancers is discussed. The implications for implementation into clinical practice are considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20734

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VRET specifically does not impair the therapeutic alliance.

    “and VRET specifically (Horigome et al., 2020; Meyerbroker and Emmelkamp, 2010).”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Meyerbroker and Emmelkamp, 2010

    The Therapeutic Alliance and Expectancy of Therapeutic Gains section reports that alliance quality was positively related to VRET outcomes for fear of flying, but not for acrophobia; it does not establish that VRET leaves the alliance unimpaired. The Concluding Remarks say there were no indications of interference with the therapeutic process, but that observation draws on internet-based treatment, not VRET specifically. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The outcomes from the IM-VRCBT group are concordant to other investigations indicating that exposure and relaxation VR scenarios are similarly effective to the classical, face-to-face version of these strategies in reducing GAD symptoms.

    “Consequently, the outcomes from the IM-VRCBT group are concordant to other investigations indicating that exposure and relaxation VR scenarios are similarly effective to the classical, face-to-face version of these strategies in reducing GAD symptoms (Gorini and Riva, 2008; Meyerbröker and Emmelkamp, 2010; Guitard et al., 2019).”

    From Standard CBT versus integrative and multimodal CBT assisted by virtual-reality for generalized anxiety disorder (2022) · cites this paper as Meyerbröker and Emmelkamp, 2010

    The Panic Disorder section reports comparable outcomes for VR-assisted CBT and CBT with in-vivo exposure, which supports the broad comparison of VR and conventional exposure. It concerns panic disorder, not GAD, and does not establish that VR relaxation scenarios are as effective as face-to-face relaxation for reducing GAD symptoms. The Efficacy of VRET section lists generalized anxiety disorder as a search term but reports no such comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • VRET has been shown to be effective for flying phobia treatment in several meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

    “VRET has been shown to be effective for FP treatment in several meta-analyses and systematic reviews [28–31].”
  • Immersive virtual reality exposure therapy may be effective for anxiety disorders.

    “A growing body of research indicates that immersive virtual reality exposure therapy may be effective for anxiety disorders (53), as well as pediatric disorders such as attention deficit disorder (54, 55).”
  • The effects of VR interventions on treatment attrition remained unclear, with some speculation of possible superiority, but no assessment in a meta-analysis.

    “The effects of VR interventions on treatment attrition remained unclear, with some speculation of possible superiority1,5,8, but no assessment in a meta-analysis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Co ˆte ´S, Bouchard S. Virtual reality exposure for phobias: a critical review. J CyberTher Rehabil 2008;1:75-91.
  2. Emmelkamp PMG, Powers MB. Agoraphobia. In: Thomas J, Hersen M, editors. Handbook of Clinical Psychology Compe- tencies. New York: Springer; 2010:723-758.
  3. Review: Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy Depression and Anxiety 15206394, 2010, 10, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/da.20734 by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [28/08/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI
  4. Ressler KJ, Rothbaum BO, Tannenbaum L, et al. Cognitive enhancers as adjuncts to psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61:1136-1144.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyerbröker, K., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Meyerbröker, Katharina
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-23
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
933-944
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982861985
Cited by
290
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, anxiety disorders, phobia, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, treatment efficacy, therapeutic relationship, nootropic drugs, process parameters, clinical implementation
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Computer Simulation, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Reality Therapy, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review