Cited by 176Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisEducation Discipline and Inequality

Assessing the Effect of Race Bias in Post-traffic Stop Outcomes Using Propensity Scores

Ridgeway, Greg·2006·Journal of Quantitative Criminology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10940-005-9000-9

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ridgeway, G.
Affiliations
RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Ridgeway, Greg
Venue
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Published
2006-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
  • 0748-4518 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7799
OpenAlex
W1966721996
Cited by
176
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
52.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Quantitative Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
traffic stops, racial bias, police discretion, racial profiling, search, citation, stop duration, Oakland Police Department

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review