Cited by 105Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityFamily and Disability Support ResearchDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Networked Empowerment on Facebook Groups for Parents of Children with Special Needs

Ammari, Tawfiq, Schoenebeck, Sarita·2015·Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Theories of empowerment explain how people gain personal and political control to take action to improve their lives. However, empowerment theories were developed prior to the Internet and fail to account for the speed and scale that people can find one another online. One domain where empowerment is critical is caring for children with special needs, in which parents are required to navigate a complex maze of services and processes to access care for their child. We conducted 43 interviews with parents of children with special needs to investigate whether using social media sites helps them to perform this caregiving work. Critically, parents are able to do this through almost real-time access to other parents on Facebook. This work introduces the concept of networked empowerment, that describes how parents find other parents, access resources, and explore new ways for promoting health advocacy among caregivers at a local and national level. We conclude with design implications for facilitating faster and better access to information and support for caregivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2702123.2702324

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empowering technology at the community level would enhance visibility and engagement, foster solidarity, collective access, resource sharing, and self-determined interdependence among individuals.

    “Therefore, empowering technology at the community level would enhance visibility and engagement, foster solidarity, collective access, resource sharing, and self-determined interdependence among individuals, in line with the concept of networked empowerment [3] and Disability Justice [12, 39, 62].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ammari, T., & Schoenebeck, S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-04-18
Pages
2805-2814
OpenAlex
W1998841208
Cited by
105
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
25.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Facebook
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
Facebook groups, parents of children with special needs, social media, care work, health advocacy, online support groups, health care access, information seeking, design implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review