Cited by 99Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

Evaluation of the French version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support during the postpartum period

Denis, A., Callahan, S., Bouvard, M.·2015·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

In the presence of physical and psychological disturbances in the postpartum period, perceived social support is often regarded as a protective factor in women's mental health. This work evaluates the psychometric properties of the French version of a questionnaire widely used internationally to measure perceived social support, which has not been yet validated in French: the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). This study collected data from 148 women (30.5 ± 5.12 years) who agreed to complete the MSPSS and a scale assessing symptoms of postpartum depression (Edinburgh Post-Natal Depression Scale, EPDS) 1 and 4 months after childbirth. The results confirm the original three-factor structure of the scale. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients are excellent. The total scale score is correlated with all three dimensions and a significantly negative correlation is found between MSPSS and EPDS. The results suggest that the French tool has generally good internal reliability. The MSPSS can provide useful data helping to identify French-speaking people at risk for negative feelings (e.g., mood disorders of perinatal period).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-014-1630-9

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denis, A., Callahan, S., & Bouvard, M.
Affiliations
  • Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR)
  • Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
  • Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (FR)
Corresponding author
Denis, A.
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2014-11-04
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1245-1251
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2032767764
Cited by
99
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, perceived social support, postpartum period, French translation, psychometric validation, postpartum depression, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, factor structure, internal consistency, perinatal mood disorders, women's mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, France, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Reproducibility of Results, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review