Cited by 88COVID-19 and Mental HealthMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Psychological consequences of COVID-19 pandemic in Italian MS patients: Signs of resilience?

Open access
Capuano, Rocco, Altieri, Manuela, Bisecco, Alvino, d’Ambrosio, Alessandro, Docimo, Renato, Buonanno, Daniela, Matrone, Federica, Giuliano, Federica +3 more·2021·Journal of Neurology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anxiety, depression and reduction of quality of life (QoL) are common in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Fear of getting sick from COVID-19, government's lockdown and the imposed social distancing might have had an impact on psychological distress and QoL. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to investigate anxiety, depression and QoL changes in pwMS during SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and lockdown in Italy. METHODS: 67 pwMS with a previous (less than 6 months) neuropsychological evaluation before SARS-CoV-2 outbreak (T0) were re-evaluated at the time of the outbreak and lockdown in Italy (T1). They underwent a clinical and neurological evaluation and completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y1), the Beck Depression Inventory second edition (BDI-II), and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MsQoL-54) at T0 and T1. Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was applied to control the false discovery rate. RESULTS: BDI-II and STAI-Y1 scores did not change between T0 and T1. At T1, MsQoL-54 scores were higher on the satisfaction with sexual life and the social function subscales, and lower on the limitation due to emotional problems subscale. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluated mood and QoL levels before and during the lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic in pwMS. No worsening of anxiety and depression levels was found. Contrariwise some improvements were noted on QoL, the most reliable regarding the sexual satisfaction and the social function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-020-10099-9

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown are traumatic events that pose threats to psychological well-being.

    “The global pandemic caused by COVID-19 and the subsequent lockdown have been widely recognized as traumatic events that pose threats to psychological well-being.”

    From Beneficial effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction training on the well-being of a female sample during the first total lockdown due to covid-19 pandemic in italy (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says lockdown-related restrictions, uncertainty, and health concerns might harm mood and mental health, supporting a possible threat to psychological well-being. It does not characterize the pandemic and lockdown as widely recognized traumatic events; the Discussion reports no negative impact on anxiety or depression in this study’s MS cohort. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capuano, R., Altieri, M., Bisecco, A., d’Ambrosio, A., Docimo, R., Buonanno, D., Matrone, F., Giuliano, F., Tedeschi, G., Santangelo, G., & Gallo, A.
Affiliations
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Corresponding author
Gallo, Antonio
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2020-07-28
Volume
268
Issue
3
Pages
743-750
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W3045716555
Cited by
88
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 10
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, resilience, sexual satisfaction, social function, emotional problems, Italy
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Personal Satisfaction, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Quarantine, Social Behavior, Sexuality, Resilience, Psychological, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review