Cited by 507Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationHealth and Well-being Studies

Assessing Chinese adolescents’ social support: the multidimensional scale of perceived social support

Chou, Kee-Lee·2000·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00098-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chou, K.-L.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chou, Kee-Lee
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
299-307
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009869341
Cited by
507
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
perceived social support, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Chinese adolescents, psychometric properties, factor structure, depression, anxiety, social networks, Hong Kong Chinese

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review