Cited by 162Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHealth and Well-being Studies

Psychometric properties of the MSPSS in older adults

STANLEY, M. A., BECK, J. G., ZEBB, B. J.·1998·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Enhanced social support is associated with increased physical and psychological health among the elderly. Although measures of social support generally are used as predictors of wellbeing, they also may be useful as outcome assessments to evaluate breadth of treatment effects. Perceived adequacy of the support network may be most relevant in this regard given its relationship to affective symptomatology. One measure of this component that has been used with older adults is the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS: Zimet et al ., 1988). However, no study has examined the psychometric properties of the MSPSS in older individuals with well-diagnosed psychiatric disorders, and no normative data are available from older adults selected carefully to be free of diagnosable pathology. The current study examined the psychometric properties of the MSPSS in two groups of older adults (ages 55-82), one with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD, N = 50) and the other without diagnosable psychopathology (n = 94). Perceived social support was higher among normal control (NC) participants than patients with GAD. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were strong, and sub-scale validity and factor analyses demonstrated consistency with findings from younger adults. Overall, the MSPSS appears useful for clinical trials with older anxious adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607869856669

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
STANLEY, M. A., BECK, J. G., & ZEBB, B. J.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
1998-08
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
186-193
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2141672420
Cited by
161
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, perceived social support, older adults, generalized anxiety disorder, psychometric properties, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor structure, reference values, affective symptoms, clinical trial outcome measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review