Cited by 40Digital Mental Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMobile Health and mHealth Applications

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Anatomy of a Woebot® (WB001): agent guided CBT for women with postpartum depression

Open access
Darcy, Alison, Beaudette, Aaron, Chiauzzi, Emil, Daniels, Jade, Goodwin, Kim, Mariano, Timothy Y., Wicks, Paul, Robinson, Athena·2022·Expert Review of Medical Devices

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum Depression (PPD) is common, persistent, and stigmatized. There are insufficient trained professionals to deliver appropriate screening, diagnosis, and treatment. AREAS COVERED: WB001 is a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) based Agent-Guided Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (AGCBT) program for the treatment of PPD, for which Breakthrough Device Designation was recently granted by the US Food and Drug Administration. WB001 combines therapeutic alliance, human-centered design, machine learning techniques, and established principles from CBT and interpersonal therapy (IPT). We introduce AGCBT as a new model of service delivery, whilst describing Woebot, the agent technology that enables guidance through the replication of some elements of human relationships. The profile describes the device's design principles, enabling technology, risk handling, and efficacy data in PPD. EXPERT OPINION: WB001 is a dynamic and personalized tool with which patients may establish a therapeutic bond. Woebot is designed to augment (rather than replace) human healthcare providers, unlocking the therapeutic potency associated with guidance, whilst retaining the scalability and agency that characterizes self-help approaches. WB001 has the potential to improve both the quality and the scalability of care through providing support to patients on waiting lists, in between clinical encounters, and enabling automation of measurement-based care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17434440.2022.2075726This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darcy, A., Beaudette, A., Chiauzzi, E., Daniels, J., Goodwin, K., Mariano, T. Y., Wicks, P., & Robinson, A.
Affiliations
Woebot Health (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Darcy, Alison
Venue
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Published
2022-04-03
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
287-301
ISSN
  • 1743-4440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2422
OpenAlex
W4283450405
Cited by
40
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 1
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Medical Devices (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Woebot Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
Woebot, postpartum depression, software as a medical device, chatbots, therapeutic relationship, human-centered design, machine learning, interpersonal psychotherapy, measurement-based care, women's mental health, retracted article
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review