Cited by 181Empathy and Medical EducationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMedicine, History, and Philosophy

From idealized clinical empathy to empathic communication in medical care

Halpern, Jodi·2014·Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11019-013-9510-4

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halpern, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Halpern, Jodi
Venue
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Published
2013-12-17
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
301-311
ISSN
  • 1386-7423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8633
OpenAlex
W1973655918
Cited by
181
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine Health Care and Philosophy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
clinical empathy, empathic communication, physician-patient communication, medical ethics
MeSH terms
Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Education, Medical, Empathy, Humans, Philosophy, Medical, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review