CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89Embodied and Extended CognitionPhenomenology and Existential PhilosophyPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enactive becoming

Open access
Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.·2021·Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
DOI 10.1007/s11097-019-09654-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The enactive approach provides a perspective on human bodies in their organic, sensorimotor, social, and linguistic dimensions, but many fundamental issues still remain unaddressed. A crucial desideratum for a theory of human bodies is that it be able to account for concrete human becoming. In this article I show that enactive theory possesses resources to achieve this goal. Being an existential structure, human becoming is best approached by a series of progressive formal indications. I discuss three standpoints on human becoming as open, indeterminate, and therefore historical using the voices of Pico della Mirandola, Gordon W. Allport, and Paulo Freire. Drawing on Gilbert Simondon’s philosophy of individuation we move from an existential to an ontological register in looking at modes of embodied becoming. His scheme of interpretation of the relation between modes of individuation allows us to understand human becoming in terms of a tendency to neotenization. I compare this ontology with an enactive theoretical account of the dimensions of embodiment, finding several compatibilities and complementarities. Various forms of bodily unfinishedness in enaction fit the Simondonian ontology and the existential analysis, where transindividuality corresponds to participatory sense-making and Freire’s joint becoming of individuals and communities correlates with the open tensions in linguistic bodies between incorporation and incarnation of linguistic acts. I test some of this ideas by considering the plausibility of artificial bodies and personal becoming from an enactive perspective, using the case of replicants in the film Blade Runner. The conclusion is that any kind of personhood, replicants included, requires living through an actual history of concrete becoming.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11097-019-09654-1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E. (2019). Motor development: Embodied, embedded, enculturated, and enabling. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 141–164. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  3. Au, W. (2018). A Marxist education: Learning to change the world. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
  4. Balibar, É. (2018). Philosophies of the transindividual: Spinoza, Marx, Freud. Australasian Philosophical Review, 2(1), 5–25. · DOI
  5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Césaire, A. (1950/1972). Discourse on colonialism (Trans. J. Pinkham). This version published by: New York: Monthly Review Press.
  8. Charlesworth, S. J. (2000). A phenomenology of working-class experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Combes, M. (2013). Gilbert Simondon and the philosophy of the transindividual (trans. T. LaMarre) Cambridge: MIT Press.
  10. Cuffari, E. (2011). Habits of transformation. Hypatia, 26(3), 535–553. · DOI
  11. Cuffari, E., Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (2015). From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1089–1025. · DOI · Paper page
  12. De Jaegher, H. (2019). Loving and knowing: Reflections for an engaged epistemology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09634-5. · DOI
  13. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507. · DOI · Paper page
  14. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E. A., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 441–447. · DOI · Paper page
  15. della Mirandola, G. P. (1948). Oration on the dignity of man (trans. E. Livermore Forbes). In E. Cassirer, P. O. Kristeller, & J. H. Randall Jr. (Eds.), The renaissance philosophy of man (pp. 223–254). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  16. Dewey, J. (1922/1988). Human nature and conduct. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  17. Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 429–452. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Di Paolo, E. (2015). Interactive time-travel: On the intersubjective retro-modulation of intentions. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(1–2), 49–74.
  19. Di Paolo, E. A. (2018). The enactive conception of life. In A. Newen, S. Gallagher, & L. de Bruin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognition: Embodied, embedded, enactive and extended, (pp 71–94). Oxford University Press. · DOI
  20. Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (2012). The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00163. · DOI
  21. Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. Cambridge: MIT Press. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Di Paolo, E. A. & Thompson, E. (2014). The enactive approach, in L. Shapiro, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition, London: Routledge Press. pp. 68–78.
  23. DiFrisco, J. (2014). Hylomorphism and the metabolic closure conception of life. Acta Biotheoretica, 62, 499–525. · DOI
  24. Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The souls of black folk. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co..
  25. Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. · DOI
  26. Duhem, L. (2012). Apeiron et physis. Simondon transducteur des présocratiques. In: J-H. Barthélémy (ed.) Cahiers Simondon. Numéro 4. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  27. Fanon, F. (1952/1986). Black skins, white masks (G. L. Markmann, Trans.). London: Pluto Press.
  28. Fanon, F. (1963/2004). The wretched of the earth. (R. Philcox, Trans.). New York: Grove Press.
  29. Freire, P. (1974/2013). Education for critical consciousness. London: Bloomsbury.
  30. Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.). London: Penguin Books. · DOI
  31. Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense- making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465–486. · DOI
  32. Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Halbwachs, M. (1950). La mémoire collective. Paris: Albin Michel.
  34. Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., & Keil, P. G. (2014). Couples as socially distributed cognitive systems: Remembering in everyday social and material contexts. Memory Studies, 7(3), 285–297. · DOI
  35. Heidegger, M. (2001). Phenomenological interpretations of Aristotle. Initiation into phenomenological research. (R. Rojcewicz, Trans.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  36. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
  37. Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
  38. Korsgaard, C. (2009). Self-constitution: Agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  39. Landecker, H., & Panofsky, A. (2013). From social structure to gene regulation, and back: A critical introduction to environmental epigenetics for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 333–357. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Landes, D. (2017). Language and development: Paradoxical trajectories in Merleau-Ponty, Simondon, and Bergson. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 597–607. · DOI
  41. Langer, S. K. (1967). Mind: An essay on human feeling (Vol. 1). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
  42. Latash, M. L. (2008). Synergy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  43. Ledwith, M. (2016). Community development in action: Putting Freire into practice. Bristol: Policy Press, University of Bristol.
  44. Lugones, M. (2003). Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
  45. Maclaren, K. (2017). Merleau-Ponty on human development and the retrospective realization of potential. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 609–621. · DOI
  46. Maturana, H., and Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy (M. Nicolaus, Trans. London: Penguin.
  48. McManus, D. (2013). The provocation to look and see: Appropriation, recollection and formal indication. In S. Reynolds, D. Egan, & A. Wendland (Eds.), Wittgenstein and Heidegger (pp. 50–65). London: Routledge.
  49. Mead, G. H. (1932). The physical thing. In: G. H. Mead, The philosophy of the present. A. E. Murphy (ed.) (pp. 119–39). LaSalle: Open Court.
  50. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1942/1963). The structure of behavior (A. L. Fisher, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
  51. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2004). Embodied action, enacted bodies: The example of hypo-glycaemia. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 43–62. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Montagu, A. (1989). Growing young (2nd ed.). New York: Bergin and Garvey.
  53. Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. In W. F. Overton, P. C. M. Molenaar, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (pp. 9–62). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  54. Read, J. (2015). The politics of transindividuality. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
  55. Shaviro, S. (2015). Discognition. London: Repeater Books.
  56. Shi, L., & Su, B. (2019). A transgenic monkey model for the study of human brain evolution. Zoological Research, 40(3), 236–238. · DOI
  57. Simondon, G. (2005). L’Individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Millon.
  58. Simondon, G. (2009). The position of the problem of ontogenesis. Parrhesia, 7, 4–16.
  59. Simondon, G. (2016). Pour une notion de situation dialectique (1960). In Simondon, G., Sur la Philosophie (1950–1980). Paris: PUF. (pp. 101–105). · DOI
  60. Stetsenko, A. (2017). The transformative mind. Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  61. Sullivan, S. (2001). Living across and through skins: Transactional bodies, pragmatism, and feminism. Carbondale: Indiana University Press.
  62. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  63. Thompson, E., & Varela, F. J. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 418–425. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Turvey, M. T. (2007). Action and perception at the level of synergies. Human Movement Science, 26, 657–697. · DOI
  65. Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34, 72–87. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Virno, P. (2015). When the word becomes flesh: Language and human nature. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  67. Voloshinov, V. N. (1929/1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (Trans. L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  68. Wagoner, B. (2017). The constructive mind: Bartlett's psychology in reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  69. Weber, A., & Varela, F. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97–125. · DOI
  70. Witherington, D. C., Overton, W. F., Lickliter, R., Marshall, P. J., & Narvaez, D. (2018). Metatheory and the primacy of conceptual analysis in developmental science. Human Development, 61, 181–198. · DOI
  71. Young, I. M. (2005). On female body experience: “Throwing like a girl” and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 89

Metadata

Authors
Di Paolo, E. A.
ORCID
Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.
Venue
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-01-11
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
783-809
ISSN
  • 1568-7759 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8676
DOI
10.1007/s11097-019-09654-1
OpenAlex
W4240778737
Cited by
89
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Sussex
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Keywords
enactive theory, human becoming, embodiment, Gilbert Simondon, existential structure, transindividuality, participatory sense-making, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Paulo Freire, artificial bodies, replicants, Blade Runner, personhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enactive becoming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11097-019-09654-1
The paper
Di Paolo, E. A. (2021). Enactive becoming. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09654-1