Cited by 34Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Pediatric Suicide Screening: A Review of the Evidence

Milliman, Chloe C., Dwyer, Patricia A., Vessey, Judith A.·2021·Journal of Pediatric Nursing

Abstract

Background Suicide rates are increasing for youths and suicide is the second leading cause of death for 10-24 year olds. This evidence-based practice project critically reviews literature regarding the effectiveness of pediatric suicide screening.Methods A literature search was guided by the following question: In pediatric patients, does suicide screening at every health encounter compared to an annual screen increase clinician identification of patients at-risk. Ten articles met inclusion criteria and were critically appraised and synthesized.Findings Youths had high rates of suicidal ideation (SI), anxiety, and depression. Pediatric universal suicide screening identified SI in youths with both psychiatric and non-psychiatric medical complaints. Patients with chronic health conditions reported higher rates of mental health symptoms and SI. A specific suicide screening instrument should be used as general mental health screens likely miss youths at-risk for SI. The Ask Suicide-Screening Questions tool is an easy to use and highly sensitive instrument for detecting suicide risk in youths.Discussion Many youths that screen positive for SI do not have known mental health concerns and would have been missed if not asked directly. Universal screening for SI identifies at-risk youth and allows nurses and other providers to intervene. The need for universal screening across pediatric health care settings using brief, validated screening tools is paramount.Application to practice Nurses working in pediatric settings should champion universal screening for SI. Unit-based quality improvement projects using the Plan-Do-Study-Act change cycle provides a model for instituting universal screening for SI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.12.011

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General mental health or depression screens often under-detect young people experiencing suicidal ideation.

    “Using a specific suicide risk screening instrument is recommended, as general mental health or depression screens often under-detect young people experiencing suicidal ideation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milliman, C. C., Dwyer, P. A., & Vessey, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Dwyer, Patricia A.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
59
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0882-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3117305189
Cited by
34
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
suicidal ideation, universal screening, youth suicide, suicide risk identification, Ask Suicide-Screening Questions, screening tool, chronic disease, depression, anxiety, nurse-led intervention, Plan-Do-Study-Act
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Humans, Mass Screening, Risk Assessment, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review