Cited by 28Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometric properties of quality of life and health-related quality of life assessments in people with multiple sclerosis

Learmonth, Y. C., Hubbard, E. A., McAuley, E., Motl, R. W.·2014·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose There is substantial interest in testing interventions for improving quality of life (QOL) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Yet, there is limited research on the psychometric properties of QOL [e.g., Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Leeds MS Quality of Life Scale (LMSQOL)] and HRQOL [e.g., Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29)] measures in this population. Such research is important for designing and interpreting interventions. We examined the test-retest reliability, measurement error, and interpretability of QOL (i.e., SWLS and LMSQOL) and HRQOL (i.e., SF-12 and MSIS-29) measures over 6 months in people with MS.Methods Individuals with MS (n = 274) completed the SWLS, LMSQOL, SF-12 and MSIS-29 on two occasions, 6 months apart. We estimated test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)], measurement error [standard error of measurement (SEM) and coefficient of variation] and interpretability [smallest detectable change (SDC)].Results Intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged between moderate and good (ICC range = 0.669-0.883); the MSIS-29 physical component had the best reliability, and the SF-12 mental component had the worst reliability. Measurement error, based on percent SEM, varied among measures; the physical and mental components of the SF-12 (%SEM = 4.6 and 5.3, respectively) had the best measurement error, and the MSIS-29 mental component (%SEM = 13.2) and the SWLS (%SEM = 12.7) had the worst measurement error. Interpretability, based on percent SDC, varied among measures; interpretability was best for the physical and mental components of the SF-12 (%SDC = 12.7 and 14.7, respectively) and worst for the MSIS-29 mental component (%SDC = 36.7) and the SWLS (%SDC = 35).Conclusion We provide novel data for helping researchers and clinicians select and interpret QOL and HRQOL measures and scores for interventions among people with MS. Such information will better inform our understanding of intervention effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-014-0639-2

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Learmonth, Y. C., Hubbard, E. A., McAuley, E., & Motl, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Motl, R. W.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2014-02-14
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
2015-2023
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2021715948
Cited by
28
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R03NS054050, NS054050)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, quality of life, health-related quality of life, psychometric properties, test-retest reliability, measurement error, minimal detectable change, Satisfaction with Life Scale, SF-12, MSIS-29
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status Indicators, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review