Cited by 106Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPhysical Activity and HealthCancer survivorship and care

Pathways between physical activity and quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis.

Motl, Robert W., McAuley, Edward·2009·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This prospective study examined symptoms of depression, fatigue, pain, self-efficacy, and social support as possible intermediaries in the pathway between changes in physical activity and quality of life (QOL) across a 6-month period in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adults with a definite diagnosis of MS wore an accelerometer for 7 days and then completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline (n = 292) and 6-months follow-up (n = 276). The data were analyzed using panel analysis and covariance modeling in Mplus 3.0. RESULTS: The initial analysis indicated that change in physical activity was associated with a statistically significant and small residual change in QOL (beta = .07). The subsequent analysis indicated that change in physical activity was associated with residual changes in fatigue (gamma = -.17), pain (gamma = -.13), social support (gamma = .07), and self-efficacy (gamma = .11), and, in turn, changes in fatigue (beta = -.13), pain (beta = -.09), social support (beta = .18), and self-efficacy (beta = .10) were associated with a residual change in QOL. CONCLUSION: The observed pattern of relationships supports the possibility that physical activity is indirectly associated with improved QOL through pathways that include fatigue, pain, social support, and self-efficacy in individuals with MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0015985

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motl, R. W., & McAuley, E.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2009-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
682-689
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2090866605
Cited by
106
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS054050)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, physical activity, quality of life, fatigue, pain, social support, self-efficacy, depression, mediation, accelerometer-measured activity, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Exercise, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review