Cited by 439Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Factors influencing quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: disability, depressive mood, fatigue and sleep quality

Lobentanz, I. S., Asenbaum, S., Vass, K., Sauter, C., Klosch, G., Kollegger, H., Kristoferitsch, W., Zeitlhofer, J.·2004·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In a series of 504 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), quality of life (QOL) and its main clinical and demographic determinants were assessed in comparison with healthy individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postal questionnaire with self-completed measures of disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS), QOL (Quality of Life Index, QLI), depressive mood (Self-rating Depression Scale, SDS), fatigue severity (Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) was sent to this sample of MS patients. RESULTS: Most patients were severely disabled; almost half were mildly to severely depressed, suffering from reduced sleep quality and/or fatigue. The multiple sclerosis patients had significantly lower QLI scores than healthy controls. EDSS and SDS scores were found to be predictors of global QLI score. Regarding the different QLI domains, mean SDS scores remained predictive for all QLI items, while mean EDSS, PSQI and FSS scores were only predictive for physical domains. CONCLUSION: Our study clearly demonstrates that depressive mood is the main factor influencing QOL. The disability status, fatigue and reduced sleep quality have an impact mainly on physical domains of life quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00257.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lobentanz, I. S., Asenbaum, S., Vass, K., Sauter, C., Klosch, G., Kollegger, H., Kristoferitsch, W., & Zeitlhofer, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Donauspital (AT)
Corresponding author
Zeitlhofer, J.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
6-13
ISSN
  • 0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0404
OpenAlex
W2036439226
Cited by
439
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, quality of life, disability, depressive mood, fatigue, sleep quality, Expanded Disability Status Scale, quality of life index, predictors of quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Austria, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Fatigue, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Sleep Wake Disorders, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review