The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Female academics continue to lag behind in terms of key output criteria, such as citations and visibility33–37.”
From Scientific publications that use promotional language in the abstract receive more citations and public attention (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“There are numerous factors affecting citation counts [270,271], which can be divided into (1) factors that are related to the paper, (2) factors related to the journal, and (3) factors related to the author [266,272].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [272]
In the citing paper
“This phenomenon can be well illustrated by the 80-20 rule describing that, usually, the top 20% of papers tend to receive 80% of total citations, while remaining publications are cited very scarcely, if cited at all [2,272].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [272]
In the citing paper
“For example, it has been shown in several studies that the importance of the journal in a field has an influence on the citation impact of the papers published in the journal (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Generally, citing authors assess selected documents based on several criteria, which are described in some previous studies (Wang and White, 1999, Tahamtan et al., 2016, Wang and Soergel, 1998).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Documents written by authors from specific countries, with specific races, and specific gender are selected for citing more frequently than others (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Researchers have differing attitudes toward quality, so that some consider accuracy and importance of research as higher quality, while for others it is creativity and novelty (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Several organizational features are reviewed by Tahamtan et al. (2016), including number of faculty members, number of published documents, number of productive and prestigious scholars in the department, rank of school or university, language of the institution, interdisciplinarity of the institutions, and the number of scholars in the organization.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“The nationality, race, age, and gender are also among the author's features by which the document value is assessed (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770
Eysenbach, G. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2012 · Cited by 1,088
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974
Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308 · Cited by 881
The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations
Maliniak, D., Powers, R., & Walter, B. F. (2013) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000209 · Cited by 749
Callaham, M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847 · Cited by 644
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L. A., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636 · Cited by 602
(2014) · Wilderness and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2014.09.008 · Cited by 583
Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences
Patsopoulos, N. A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.19.2362 · Cited by 498
Characteristics of highly cited papers
Aksnes, D. W. (2003) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.3152/147154403781776645 · Cited by 493
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chu, H., & Krichel, T. (2007). Downloads vs. citations in economics: Relationships, contributing factors and beyond. Paper presented at the C3—Proceedings of ISSI 2007—11th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952034760&partnerID=40&md5=93cf9b04e77b4eab198b8568f50e8ca7 .
- Gallivan, M. J. (2012). Analyzing citation impact of IS research by women and men: Do women have higher levels of research impact? Paper presented at the C3—SIGMIS-CPR’12—Proceedings of the 2012 computers and people research conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863524757&partnerID=40&md5=d488810d10e756a2beaa3839e525e766 .
- Gomes, J. A. N. F., & Vieira, E. S. (2009). How to improve the citation impact of a paper: Choice of journal, co-authors and institutional addresses. Paper presented at the C3—12th International conference on scientometrics and informetrics, ISSI 2009. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84901983008&partnerID=40&md5=ec158d329d4c5e0b81b579636c7c36f3 .
- Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of book-based disciplines: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar and Scopus. In Proceedings of ISSI 2011: The 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 361–372.
- Schneider, J. W., & Henriksen, D. (2013). Are larger effect sizes in experimental studies good predictors of higher citation rates? A bayesian examination C3. In Proceedings of ISSI 2013—14th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84896830466&partnerID=40&md5=960a18915c0fa828b5625ff9415a083c .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 913
Citation impact was highly variable for reporting guidelines of health research: a citation analysis
Caulley, L., Cheng, W., Catalá-López, F., Whelan, J., Khoury, M., Ferraro, J., Husereau, D., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.013 · Cited by 37
Exploring the determinants of research performance for early-career researchers: a literature review
Lee, D. H. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04868-2 · Cited by 40
Luo, F., Sun, A., Erdt, M., Raamkumar, A. S., & Theng, Y. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2571-z · Cited by 37
Predictive power of conference-related factors on citation rates of conference papers
Lee, D. H. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2943-z · Cited by 38
Citations are a good way to determine the quality of research
Caon, M., Trapp, J., & Baldock, C. (2020) · Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-020-00941-9 · Cited by 42
The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Grilli, L. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101204 · Cited by 42
Napolitano, F., Xu, X., & Gao, X. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab456 · Cited by 37
A bibliometric analysis on gift giving
Gupta, M., Parvathy, Givi, J., Dey, M., Baker, H. K., & Das, G. (2022) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21785 · Cited by 38
Quantifying revolutionary discoveries: Evidence from Nobel prize-winning papers
Wei, C., Li, J., & Shi, D. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103252 · Cited by 38
The impact of a paper’s new combinations and new components on its citation
Yan, Y., Tian, S., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03314-6 · Cited by 41
Applying text similarity algorithm to analyze the triangular citation behavior of scientists
Liu, Y., & Chen, M. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107362 · Cited by 36
Yassine, S., Kadry, S., & Sicilia, M. (2021) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1431 · Cited by 36
Rahman, S. U., Faisal, F., & Ali, A. (2022) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-022-00980-5 · Cited by 36
Prokop, P., Masarovič, R., Hajdúchová, S., Ježová, Z., Zvaríková, M., & Fedor, P. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142417029 · Cited by 35
Social Network Analysis of Scientific Articles Published by Food Policy
Popp, J., Balogh, P., Oláh, J., Kot, S., Rákos, M., & Lengyel, P. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030577 · Cited by 41
Open access to journal articles in oncology: current situation and citation impact
Hua, F., Sun, H., Walsh, T., Glenny, A., & Worthington, H. V. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx398 · Cited by 36
de Winter, J. (2024) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-024-04939-y · Cited by 34
“…based on research that demonstrated a correlation between the number of authors and citation count (Kousha & Thelwall, 2022; Sommer & Wohlrabe, 2017; Tahamtan et al., 2016), the number of authors was determined by counting the semicolons present in the ‘Authors’ record and subsequently adding one.”
Graduate employability: A bibliometric analysis
Wahab, M. H. S., Hosen, M., Islam, M. A., Chowdhury, M. A. M., Jantan, A. H., & Wahab, S. A. (2024) · Global Business and Organizational Excellence · doi:10.1002/joe.22267 · Cited by 34
Bibliometric Studies on Gender Disparities in Science
Halevi, G. (2019) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_21 · Cited by 34
Lunny, C., Neelakant, T., Chen, A., Shinger, G., Stevens, A., Tasnim, S., Sadeghipouya, S., Adams, S., Zheng, Y. W., Lin, L., et al. (2021) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1530 · Cited by 36
Identifying potentially excellent publications using a citation-based machine learning approach
Hu, Z., Cui, J., & Lin, A. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103323 · Cited by 34
Scientific collaboration networks in Pakistan and their impact on institutional research performance
Sabah, F., Hassan, S., Muazzam, A., Iqbal, S., Soroya, S. H., & Sarwar, R. (2018) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-03-2018-0036 · Cited by 34
Scientific journals still matter in the era of academic search engines and preprint archives
Kim, L., Portenoy, J., West, J. D., & Stovel, K. W. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24326 · Cited by 34
A review of scientific impact prediction: tasks, features and methods
Xia, W., Li, T., & Li, C. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04547-8 · Cited by 35
Xue, Z., He, G., Liu, J., Jiang, Z., Zhao, S. X., & Lu, W. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103216 · Cited by 34
Twenty‐five years of Gender, Work and Organization: A bibliometric analysis
Kataria, A., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12530 · Cited by 32
Davidescu, A. A., Petcu, M. A., Curea, Ș. C., & Manta, E. M. (2022) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2021.12.016 · Cited by 32
Fahimifar, S., Mousavi, K., Mozaffari, F., & Ausloos, M. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-022-01480-z · Cited by 37
Trend in H2S Biology and Medicine Research—A Bibliometric Analysis
Yang, G., & Wu, L. (2017) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules22122087 · Cited by 31
Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE
Petersen, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.100974 · Cited by 31
Citation practices in tourism research: Toward a gender conscientious engagement
Nunkoo, R., Hall, C. M., Rughoobur-Seetah, S., & Teeroovengadum, V. (2019) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2019.102755 · Cited by 31
Self-correction in science: The effect of retraction on the frequency of citations
Kühberger, A., Streit, D., & Scherndl, T. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277814 · Cited by 37
What Crowdsourcing Can Offer to Cross-Cultural Psychological Science
Cuccolo, K., Irgens, M. S., Zlokovich, M. S., Grahe, J. E., & Edlund, J. E. (2020) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/1069397120950628 · Cited by 38
ORCID-linked labeled data for evaluating author name disambiguation at scale
Kim, J., & Owen-Smith, J. D. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03826-6 · Cited by 31
Abbas, K., Hasan, M. K., Abbasi, A., Mokhtar, U. A., Khan, A., Abdullah, S. N. H. S., Dong, S., Islam, S., Alboaneen, D., & Ahmed, F. R. A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3290906 · Cited by 35
Polyakov, M., Polyakov, S., & Iftekhar, M. S. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2523-7 · Cited by 29
Which factors affect the scientific impact of review papers in IS research? A scientometric study
Wagner, G., Prester, J., Roche, M. P., Schryen, G., Benlian, A., Paré, G., & Templier, M. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103427 · Cited by 32
Dumas-Mallet, E., Garenne, A., Boraud, T., & Gonon, F. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03380-1 · Cited by 31
Nagendrababu, V., Jaćimović, J., Jakovljević, A., Rossi‐Fedele, G., & Dummer, P. M. H. (2021) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.13668 · Cited by 28
Systematic Reviews in Health Research
Egger, M., Higgins, J. P. T., & Smith, G. D. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119099369.ch1 · Cited by 30
Fan, L., Guo, L., Wang, X., Xu, L., & Liu, F. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2022.101350 · Cited by 31
How much biodiversity is concealed in the word ‘biodiversity’?
Mammola, S., Fukushima, C. S., Biondo, G., Bongiorni, L., Cianferoni, F., Domenici, P., Fruciano, C., Giudice, A. L., Macías‐Hernández, N., Malumbres‐Olarte, J., et al. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.12.003 · Cited by 29
Chhabra, M., Hassan, R., Shah, M. A., & Sharma, R. (2023) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2023.2178338 · Cited by 29
Khan, N. F., & Khan, M. N. (2021) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration · doi:10.1108/apjba-09-2021-0430 · Cited by 32
Alamah, Z., AlSoussy, I., & Fakih, A. (2023) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies11030090 · Cited by 28
Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Study and Directions for Future Research
Wu, C.-C., Islam, M. M., Poly, T. N., & Weng, Y.-C. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14040397 · Cited by 31
Conflict in nursing studies: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited papers
Kantek, F., & Yeşilbaş, H. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14463 · Cited by 29
Gao, T., Liu, J., Pan, R., & Wang, H. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121634 · Cited by 29
The gender citation gap: Approaches, explanations, and implications
Wu, C. (2024) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.13189 · Cited by 33
Zhang, M., Zhang, G., Liu, Y., Zhai, X., & Han, X. (2020) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101068 · Cited by 29
A new citation concept: Triangular citation in the literature
Liu, Y., Yang, L., & Chen, M. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101141 · Cited by 27
The evolution of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Global productivity and publication trends
Danış, F., & Kudu, E. (2022) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.01.071 · Cited by 27
Shang, Y., Sivertsen, G., Cao, Z., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04430-6 · Cited by 27
Akpan, I. J. (2020) · Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/08276331.2020.1786229 · Cited by 27
Interlocking boards and firm outcomes: a review
Ramsawak, R. A., Buertey, S., Maheshwari, G., Dang-Pham, D., & Phan, C. T. (2023) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2023-0501 · Cited by 26
Domenteanu, A., Cibu, B., & Delcea, C. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16072764 · Cited by 29
Bornmann, L., Ye, A. Y., & Ye, F. Y. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2772-0 · Cited by 25
The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers
Gong, K., Xie, J., Cheng, Y., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03146-4 · Cited by 26
Enterprise risk management literature: emerging themes and future directions
Jaber, T. A., & Shah, S. M. (2023) · Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change · doi:10.1108/jaoc-07-2022-0106 · Cited by 26
Forecasting the future of library and information science and its sub-fields
Taşkın, Z. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03800-2 · Cited by 25
Edible insects: A bibliometric analysis and current trends of published studies (1953–2021)
Kavle, R. R., Pritchard, E. T. M., Bekhit, A. E. A., Carne, A., & Agyei, D. (2022) · International Journal of Tropical Insect Science · doi:10.1007/s42690-022-00814-6 · Cited by 25
Thelwall, M. A. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05361-8 · Cited by 40
Ruggieri, R., Pecoraro, F., & Luzi, D. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03802-0 · Cited by 24
Adetunji, T. L., Olisah, C., Adegbaju, O. D., Olawale, F., Adetunji, A. E., Siebert, F., & SIEBERT, S. J. (2022) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2022.01.030 · Cited by 24
Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis
Jin, H., Lu, L., & Fan, H. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19063742 · Cited by 28
Fifty Years of Research in Deposit Insurance: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review
Sardana, V., & Singhania, S. (2022) · FIIB Business Review · doi:10.1177/23197145221116455 · Cited by 24
Liao, L., Liao, K., Wei, N., Ye, Y., Li, L., & Wu, Z. (2023) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106198 · Cited by 35
The association between prior knowledge and the disruption of an article
Sheng, L., Lyu, D., Ruan, X., Shen, H., & Cheng, Y. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04751-0 · Cited by 24
Hu, Z., Lin, A., & Willett, P. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2954-9 · Cited by 24
Rose, R., Hölzle, K., & Björk, J. (2020) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12361 · Cited by 24
Bibliometric Analysis on Geriatric Nursing Research in Web of Science (1900–2020)
Ghamgosar, A., Zarghani, M., & Nemati‐Anaraki, L. (2021) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2021/8758161 · Cited by 31
Bibliometric analysis on Brain-computer interfaces in a 30-year period
Yin, Z., Wan, Y., Fang, H., Li, L., Wang, T., Wang, Z., & Tan, D. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-04226-4 · Cited by 23
Ruan, X., Ao, W., Lyu, D., Cheng, Y., & Li, J. (2023) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515231161133 · Cited by 25
Keating, D. M., Richards, A. S., Palomares, N. A., Banas, J. A., Joyce, N., & Rains, S. A. (2019) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650219887025 · Cited by 23
What is the best article publishing strategy for early career scientists?
Zhang, Y., & Yu, Q. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03297-4 · Cited by 23
Li, J., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753388 · Cited by 28
State of art in tax evasion research: A bibliometric review
Mansour, A. Z., Ahmi, A., Alkhuzaie, A. S. H., Alhmood, M. A., Popoola, O. M. J., & Altarawneh, M. (2023) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3422 · Cited by 22
Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Mutz, R. (2020) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101098 · Cited by 26
Ma, Q., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17113781 · Cited by 22
An evaluation of the role of “biological evidence” in zoo and aquarium enrichment practices
Brereton, J., & Rose, P. (2022) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.31.1.002 · Cited by 22
Ha, T. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121974 · Cited by 25
International journal of finance and economics: A bibliometric overview
Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., Goyal, K., & Gupta, P. (2022) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.2725 · Cited by 23
Caracterización de la producción científica de Ecuador en el periodo 2007–2017 en Scopus
Moreira-Mieles, L. L., Intriago, J. C. M., Crespo-Gascón, S., & Guerrero‐Casado, J. (2020) · Investigación Bibliotecológica Archivonomía Bibliotecología e Información · doi:10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2020.82.58082 · Cited by 22
Păduraru, O., Moroșanu, A., Paduraru, C. Ș., & Cărăușu, E. M. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10030555 · Cited by 23
Innovation intermediaries: a review, bibliometric analysis, and research agenda
Zhang, C., & Liu, N. (2023) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-023-10030-0 · Cited by 22
Chen, K., Song, N., Zhao, Y., Peng, J., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103691 · Cited by 21
Revisiting the Circular Economy Paradox: A Triple Bottom Line Perspective
Serrano, M. F., & Salesa, A. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3539 · Cited by 22
I’ll Read That!: What Title Elements Attract Readers to an Article?
Hallock, R. M., & Bennett, T. N. (2020) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628320959948 · Cited by 21
Identifying widely disseminated scientific papers on social media
Ma, Y.-X., Li, T.-T., Mao, J., Ba, Z.-C., & Li, G. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102945 · Cited by 18
Gender gap among highly cited researchers, 2014–2021
Meho, L. I. (2022) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00218 · Cited by 26
Categorization and correlational analysis of quality factors influencing citation
Khatoon, A., Daud, A. Y., & Amjad, T. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10657-3 · Cited by 29
Ayanwale, M. A., Molefi, R. R., & Oyeniran, S. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00119-5 · Cited by 21
Farys, R., & Wolbring, T. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23802 · Cited by 21
Why Do Some Articles in Planning Journals Get Cited More than Others?
Stevens, M. R., Park, K., Tian, G., Kim, K., & Ewing, R. (2019) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x19827083 · Cited by 21
Measuring national self-referencing patterns of major science producers
Khelfaoui, M., Larrègue, J., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03381-0 · Cited by 22
Research article titles in written feedback on English as a second language writing
Pearson, W. S. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03388-7 · Cited by 24
Bu, Y., Lu, W. P., Wu, Y., Chen, H., & Huang, Y. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102429 · Cited by 21
Herman, E. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1093/femsle/fny200 · Cited by 21
Bibliometric Analysis of Literature in Snake Venom-Related Research Worldwide (1933–2022)
Sofyantoro, F., Yudha, D. S., Lischer, K., Nuringtyas, T. R., Putri, W. A., Kusuma, W. A., Purwestri, Y. A., & Swasono, R. T. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12162058 · Cited by 26
A literature review of risk, regulation, and profitability of banks using a scientometric study
Rastogi, S., Sharma, A., Pinto, G., & Bhimavarapu, V. M. (2022) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-022-00146-4 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K.
- Affiliations
- Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- ORCID
- Tahamtan, Iman
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2016-02-15
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1195-1225
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2277805675
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 212
- Citations by year
- 2026: 97 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 37.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- citation counts, paper quality, journal impact factor, number of authors, author reputation, self-citation, international cooperation, author productivity, research funding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
