The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Female academics continue to lag behind in terms of key output criteria, such as citations and visibility33–37.”
From Scientific publications that use promotional language in the abstract receive more citations and public attention (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“There are numerous factors affecting citation counts [270,271], which can be divided into (1) factors that are related to the paper, (2) factors related to the journal, and (3) factors related to the author [266,272].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [272]
In the citing paper
“This phenomenon can be well illustrated by the 80-20 rule describing that, usually, the top 20% of papers tend to receive 80% of total citations, while remaining publications are cited very scarcely, if cited at all [2,272].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [272]
In the citing paper
“For example, it has been shown in several studies that the importance of the journal in a field has an influence on the citation impact of the papers published in the journal (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Generally, citing authors assess selected documents based on several criteria, which are described in some previous studies (Wang and White, 1999, Tahamtan et al., 2016, Wang and Soergel, 1998).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Documents written by authors from specific countries, with specific races, and specific gender are selected for citing more frequently than others (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Researchers have differing attitudes toward quality, so that some consider accuracy and importance of research as higher quality, while for others it is creativity and novelty (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Several organizational features are reviewed by Tahamtan et al. (2016), including number of faculty members, number of published documents, number of productive and prestigious scholars in the department, rank of school or university, language of the institution, interdisciplinarity of the institutions, and the number of scholars in the organization.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“The nationality, race, age, and gender are also among the author's features by which the document value is assessed (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770
Eysenbach, G. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2012 · Cited by 1,088
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974
Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308 · Cited by 881
The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations
Maliniak, D., Powers, R., & Walter, B. F. (2013) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000209 · Cited by 749
Callaham, M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847 · Cited by 644
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L. A., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636 · Cited by 602
(2014) · Wilderness and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2014.09.008 · Cited by 583
Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences
Patsopoulos, N. A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.19.2362 · Cited by 498
Characteristics of highly cited papers
Aksnes, D. W. (2003) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.3152/147154403781776645 · Cited by 493
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chu, H., & Krichel, T. (2007). Downloads vs. citations in economics: Relationships, contributing factors and beyond. Paper presented at the C3—Proceedings of ISSI 2007—11th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952034760&partnerID=40&md5=93cf9b04e77b4eab198b8568f50e8ca7 .
- Gallivan, M. J. (2012). Analyzing citation impact of IS research by women and men: Do women have higher levels of research impact? Paper presented at the C3—SIGMIS-CPR’12—Proceedings of the 2012 computers and people research conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863524757&partnerID=40&md5=d488810d10e756a2beaa3839e525e766 .
- Gomes, J. A. N. F., & Vieira, E. S. (2009). How to improve the citation impact of a paper: Choice of journal, co-authors and institutional addresses. Paper presented at the C3—12th International conference on scientometrics and informetrics, ISSI 2009. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84901983008&partnerID=40&md5=ec158d329d4c5e0b81b579636c7c36f3 .
- Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of book-based disciplines: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar and Scopus. In Proceedings of ISSI 2011: The 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 361–372.
- Schneider, J. W., & Henriksen, D. (2013). Are larger effect sizes in experimental studies good predictors of higher citation rates? A bayesian examination C3. In Proceedings of ISSI 2013—14th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84896830466&partnerID=40&md5=960a18915c0fa828b5625ff9415a083c .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 913
Funding as a determinant of Citation Impact in Scientific Papers in different countries
Mcmanus, C. M., Neves, A. A. B., Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F., Pimentel, F., & Pimentel, D. (2023) · Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências · doi:10.1590/0001-3765202320220515 · Cited by 21
The Evolution and Future Directions of Green Buildings Research: A Scientometric Analysis
Wang, C., Che, Y., Xia, M., Lin, C., Chen, Y., Li, X., Chen, H., Luo, J., & Fan, G. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14020345 · Cited by 20
Large-scale analysis of micro-level citation patterns reveals nuanced selection criteria
Poncela-Casasnovas, J., Gerlach, M., Aguirre, N., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0585-7 · Cited by 20
Guo, X., Chen, S., & Guo, Y.-M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04254-0 · Cited by 23
The consistency of impact of preprints and their journal publications
Xu, F., Ou, G., Ma, T., & Wang, X. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101153 · Cited by 19
Research articles promoted in embargo e-mails receive higher citations and altmetrics
Lemke, S., Brede, M., Rotgeri, S., & Peters, I. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04217-1 · Cited by 19
Culture, heritage looting, and tourism: A text mining review approach
Loureiro, S. M. C., Al‐Ansi, A., Ryu, H. B., Ariza‐Montes, A., & Han, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944250 · Cited by 19
A critical review of auditing at the time of blockchain technology – a bibliometric analysis
Hakami, T. A., Sabri, O., Al-Shargabi, B., Rahmat, M. M., & Attia, O. (2023) · EuroMed Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/emjb-01-2023-0010 · Cited by 19
Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2658-1 · Cited by 19
Sotudeh, H., Arabzadeh, H., & Mirzabeigi, M. (2019) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2019.05.004 · Cited by 22
Chien, T., Wang, H., & Lai, F. (2019) · JMIR Dermatology · doi:10.2196/11015 · Cited by 19
Akinwekomi, A. D., & Akhtar, F. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24030329 · Cited by 19
Use of science in public policy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic efforts to ‘Follow the Science’
Bozeman, B. L. (2022) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scac026 · Cited by 19
Citations in Scientific Texts: Do Social Relations Matter?
Milard, B., & Tanguy, L. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24061 · Cited by 19
Acknowledgement network and citation count: the moderating role of collaboration network
Tian, S., Xu, X., & Li, P. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04090-y · Cited by 19
LLM-based feature generation from text for interpretable machine learning
Balek, V., Sýkora, L., Sklenák, V., & Kliegr, T. (2025) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-025-06867-1 · Cited by 18
Global trends in scaling nature-based solutions for disaster risk reduction
Quesada-Román, A., & Montalván-Burbano, N. (2026) · Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C · doi:10.1016/j.pce.2026.104302 · Cited by 18
Significance and implications of accurate and proper citations in clinical research studies
Ngatuvai, M., Autrey, C., McKenny, M., & Elkbuli, A. (2021) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102841 · Cited by 26
Walters, W. H. (2021) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102484 · Cited by 18
A Machine Learning Model to Predict Citation Counts of Scientific Papers in Otology Field
Al-Ohali, Y., Fayed, M. S., Mesallam, T. A., Abdelsamad, Y., Almuhawas, F. A., & Hagr, A. A. (2022) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/2239152 · Cited by 20
Using blockchain for global governance: past, present and future
Tiwari, C. K., & Pal, A. (2022) · South Asian Journal of Business Studies · doi:10.1108/sajbs-07-2022-0252 · Cited by 21
Han, J., Jeon, B., & Geum, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2022.3213867 · Cited by 18
Oppong, S. (2023) · Psychology and Developing Societies · doi:10.1177/09713336231152301 · Cited by 18
Staszkiewicz, P. (2018) · Managerial Auditing Journal · doi:10.1108/maj-05-2017-1552 · Cited by 18
Mapping the research trends of third language acquisition: A bibliometric analysis based on Scopus
Liu, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021517 · Cited by 21
Alzahmi, R., Syed, R. T., Singh, D., Arshi, T., & Kutty, S. V. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05650-w · Cited by 17
Quoted speech in linguistics research article titles: patterns of use and effects on citations
Pearson, W. S. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03827-5 · Cited by 19
Chen, C., Chien, T., Ho, S. Y.-C., & Lai, F. (2022) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000029396 · Cited by 17
dos Santos, A. C. D. S. G., Reis, A. D. C., de Souza, C. G., dos Santos, I. L., Ferreira, L. A. F., & Senna, P. (2022) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-10-2021-0580 · Cited by 18
Highly cited educational technology journal articles: a descriptive and critical analysis
Mertala, P., Moens, E., & Teräs, M. (2022) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2022.2141253 · Cited by 22
Mapping the desktop research in Pakistan: a bibliometric analysis
Wahid, N., Amin, U., Khan, M. A., Siddique, N., & Warraich, N. F. (2023) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-07-2022-0159 · Cited by 20
Open Access Advantages as a Function of the Discipline: Mixed-methods Study
Hadad, S., & Aharony, N. (2023) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102746 · Cited by 23
The interaction of inter-organizational diversity and team size, and the scientific impact of papers
Yoo, H. S., Jung, Y. L., Lee, J. Y., & Lee, C. W. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103851 · Cited by 23
The continuity and citation impact of scientific collaboration with different gender composition
Shen, H., Xie, J., Ao, W., & Cheng, Y. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101248 · Cited by 17
Zhang, L., & Ma, L. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04684-8 · Cited by 19
Zhang, J., & Guan, J. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2155-3 · Cited by 17
Bibliometrics and modern scientific libraries
Mokhnacheva, Y. V., & Tsvetkova, V. A. (2018) · Scientific and Technical Libraries · doi:10.33186/1027-3689-2018-6-51-62 · Cited by 17
Zhou, Y. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03995-y · Cited by 16
Evidence-based recommendations for increasing the citation frequency of original articles
Heßler, N., & Ziegler, A. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04378-7 · Cited by 16
Saravudecha, C., Thungfai, D. N., Phasom, C., Gunta-in, S., Metha, A., Punyaphet, P., Sookruay, T., Sakuludomkan, W., & Koonrungsesomboon, N. (2023) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications11020021 · Cited by 20
Corrales-Garay, D., Rodríguez-Sánchez, J.-L., & Montero, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3391054 · Cited by 23
Jiménez, S., Avila, Y., Dueñas, G., & Gelbukh, A. F. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03526-1 · Cited by 16
How the high-impact papers formed? A study using data from social media and citation
Hou, J., & Ma, D. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03703-2 · Cited by 16
Academic in-group bias in the top five economics journals
Lutmar, C., & Reingewertz, Y. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04174-9 · Cited by 16
What we can learn from tweets linking to research papers
Liu, X. Z., & Fang, H. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2279-0 · Cited by 16
A bibliometric mapping of malaysian publication using co-word analysis
Nadzar, N. M. A. M., Bakri, A., & Ibrahim, R. B. (2017) · Cited by 16
Analysis of the scientific literature's abstract writing style and citations
Hu, H., Wang, D., & Deng, S. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-05-2020-0188 · Cited by 16
Sharma, S., & Lenka, U. (2021) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2021.1943553 · Cited by 15
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on the Main Genes Involved in Meat Tenderness
Gonzales-Malca, J. A., Tirado-Kulieva, V. A., Abanto-López, M. S., Aldana-Juárez, W. L., & Zapata, C. M. P. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12212976 · Cited by 15
Article’s scientific prestige: Measuring the impact of individual articles in the web of science
Chen, Y., Koch, T., Zakiyeva, N., Liu, K., Xu, Z., Chen, C., Nakano, J., & Honda, K. (2023) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2023.101379 · Cited by 15
Methodological quality, risk of bias, and reporting quality: A confusion persists
Faggion, C. M. (2023) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.12550 · Cited by 15
Huang, M., Naser-Tavakolian, K., Clifton, M. A., Franceschi, A. M., Kim, D., Zhang, J. Z., & Schweitzer, M. (2019) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.5313 · Cited by 16
Guerrero‐Casado, J. (2017) · Idesia · doi:10.4067/s0718-34292017000400027 · Cited by 15
Kou, Y., Gray, C. M., Toombs, A. L., & Nardi, B. A. (2018) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3170427.3188409 · Cited by 15
Bornmann, L. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.007 · Cited by 15
Judicious Use of Bibliometrics to Supplement Peer Evaluations of Research in Kinesiology
Knudson, D. V. (2019) · Kinesiology Review · doi:10.1123/kr.2017-0046 · Cited by 17
Artificial Intelligence in Dementia: A Bibliometric Study
Wu, C.-C., Su, C.-H., Islam, M. M., & Liao, M.-H. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13122109 · Cited by 16
Rashid, U., Abdullah, M., Khatib, S. F. A., Khan, F. M., & Akhter, J. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24254 · Cited by 22
Drivers of citations in social pharmacy and practice research articles
Shcherbakova, N., Desselle, S. P., Bandiera, C., Canedo, J., Law, A. V., & Aslani, P. (2024) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.03.004 · Cited by 17
Ukrainian universities in QS World University Rankings: when the means become ends
Hladchenko, M. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05165-2 · Cited by 14
Diaz-Barrera, M. E., Aucca, C. A., Pacheco‐Mendoza, J., Moreno-Albarrán, M., Pacheco-Luza, E. F., & Rengifo, C. (2025) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00700-w · Cited by 14
The careers behind and the impact of solo author articles in Nature and Science
Emmer, A. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03145-5 · Cited by 13
Salandra, R., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. J. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104130 · Cited by 15
Wang, K., Shi, W., Bai, J., Zhao, X., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04026-6 · Cited by 14
A bibliometric analysis of the graduate employability research trends
Masduki, N. A., Mahfar, M., & Senin, A. A. (2022) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22145 · Cited by 14
Measuring the innovation of method knowledge elements in scientific literature
Wang, Z., Wang, K., Liu, J., Jing, H., & Chen, H. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04350-5 · Cited by 14
Schroter, S., Weber, W. E. J., Loder, E., Wilkinson, J., & Kirkham, J. J. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073880 · Cited by 14
E-Vahdati, S., & Aripin, N. (2023) · Revista de Contabilidad · doi:10.6018/rcsar.468261 · Cited by 19
Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press)
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2373-3 · Cited by 14
THE PROPERTY THAT IS FACTUALLY BEING EVALUATED WHEN THEY SAY THEY EVALUATE IMPACT
LAZAREV, V. S. (2019) · Scholarly Research and Information · doi:10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-2-129-138 · Cited by 17
Heterogeneous Knowledge Learning of Predictive Academic Intelligence in Transportation
Lü, H., Zhu, Y., Lin, Q., Wang, T., Niu, Z., & Herrera‐Viedma, E. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.3041904 · Cited by 14
Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies: A fifteen-year bibliometric quest for a bigger impact
Syahid, A., & Qodir, A. (2021) · Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies · doi:10.17263/jlls.903415 · Cited by 17
Xu, S., An, M., & An, X. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04067-x · Cited by 14
Bibliometric Analysis of Top 100 Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Orthopaedic Literature
Banerjee, S., Khatri, N., Kaur, A., & Elhence, A. (2022) · Indian Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s43465-022-00604-9 · Cited by 13
Geographic Citation Gaps in NLP Research
Rungta, M., Singh, J., Mohammad, S. M., & Yang, D. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.89 · Cited by 13
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study
Perneger, T. (2023) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00137-1 · Cited by 14
Sun, Z. (2024) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101501 · Cited by 15
Why are some articles highly cited in applied linguistics? A bibliometric study
Zhang, S., & Aryadoust, V. (2025) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263124000743 · Cited by 13
Mapping collaboration in international coffee certification research
Cabrera, L. C., Caldarelli, C. E., & da Câmara, M. R. G. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03549-8 · Cited by 13
A decade of nanotechnology research in Nigeria (2010–2020): a scientometric analysis
Lateef, A., Azeez, M. A., Badmus, S. O., & Adigun, G. O. (2021) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-021-05322-1 · Cited by 13
Research artifacts and citations in computer systems papers
Frachtenberg, E. (2022) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.887 · Cited by 16
Liu, J., Chen, H., Liu, Z., Bu, Y., & Gu, W. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2022.101318 · Cited by 15
Copiello, S. (2019) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.002 · Cited by 12
Remote sensing applied to the study of fire in savannas: A literature review
Júnior, F. R. F., dos Santos, A. M., Alvarado, S. T., da Silva, C. F. A., & Nunes, F. G. (2023) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102448 · Cited by 14
Zhang, X., Yin, D., Tang, L., & Zhao, H. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103669 · Cited by 12
Usability Testing: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on WoS Data
ShojaeiBaghini, M., Mohammadi, M., & Norouzkhani, N. (2024) · Journal of Scientometric Research · doi:10.5530/jscires.13.1.2 · Cited by 18
Sullivan, A. L., Weeks, M. R., Miller, F. G., Nguyen, T., Kulkarni, T., Williams, S. C., & Kim, J. (2024) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101325 · Cited by 11
How to measure interdisciplinary research? A systemic design for the model of measurement
Cantone, G. G. (2024) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05085-1 · Cited by 18
A global review of ornamental fish and shellfish research
Peh, J. H., & Azra, M. N. (2024) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741719 · Cited by 12
Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis: Response to discussants
Williams, R. A., & Bornmann, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.09.013 · Cited by 12
INSUFFICIENT DEFINITIONS OR A VAGUELY GRASPED NOTION? ON DEFINITIONS OF “IMPACT”
LAZAREV, V. S. (2019) · Scholarly Research and Information · doi:10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-1-63-78 · Cited by 13
Integrative oncology from a bibliometric point of view
Danell, J.-A. B. (2020) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102477 · Cited by 12
Yaxley, K. L., & To, M. (2020) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-020-00936-w · Cited by 12
Mirnezami, S. R., & Beaudry, C. (2021) · Journal of African Economies · doi:10.1093/jae/ejab008 · Cited by 13
What does open peer review bring to scientific articles? Evidence from PLoS journals
Wei, C., Zhao, J., Ni, J., & Li, J. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04683-9 · Cited by 12
Pasteur’s quadrant in AI: do patent-cited papers have higher scientific impact?
Gao, X., Wu, Q., Liu, Y., & Yang, R. (2024) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04925-w · Cited by 12
$$C^3$$ C 3 -index: a PageRank based multi-faceted metric for authors’ performance measurement
Pradhan, D. K., Paul, P. S., Maheswari, U., Nandi, S., & Chakraborty, T. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2168-y · Cited by 12
Computer Science in ASEAN: A Ten-Year Bibliometric Analysis (2009–2018)
Hew, J.-J., Lee, V., Ooi, K., & Lin, B. (2019) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2019.1601538 · Cited by 12
Hodge, D. R., & Turner, P. R. (2022) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/10497315221136623 · Cited by 12
The impact and implications of SWFs: a systematic review of literature
Garg, R., & Shukla, A. (2021) · Qualitative Research in Financial Markets · doi:10.1108/qrfm-08-2020-0171 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K.
- Affiliations
- Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- ORCID
- Tahamtan, Iman
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2016-02-15
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1195-1225
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2277805675
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 212
- Citations by year
- 2026: 97 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 37.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- citation counts, paper quality, journal impact factor, number of authors, author reputation, self-citation, international cooperation, author productivity, research funding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
