Cited by 913scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsAcademic Writing and Publishing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature

Tahamtan, Iman, Safipour Afshar, Askar, Ahamdzadeh, Khadijeh·2016·Scientometrics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 212 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Chu, H., & Krichel, T. (2007). Downloads vs. citations in economics: Relationships, contributing factors and beyond. Paper presented at the C3—Proceedings of ISSI 2007—11th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952034760&partnerID=40&md5=93cf9b04e77b4eab198b8568f50e8ca7 .
  2. Gallivan, M. J. (2012). Analyzing citation impact of IS research by women and men: Do women have higher levels of research impact? Paper presented at the C3—SIGMIS-CPR’12—Proceedings of the 2012 computers and people research conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863524757&partnerID=40&md5=d488810d10e756a2beaa3839e525e766 .
  3. Gomes, J. A. N. F., & Vieira, E. S. (2009). How to improve the citation impact of a paper: Choice of journal, co-authors and institutional addresses. Paper presented at the C3—12th International conference on scientometrics and informetrics, ISSI 2009. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84901983008&partnerID=40&md5=ec158d329d4c5e0b81b579636c7c36f3 .
  4. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of book-based disciplines: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar and Scopus. In Proceedings of ISSI 2011: The 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 361–372.
  5. Schneider, J. W., & Henriksen, D. (2013). Are larger effect sizes in experimental studies good predictors of higher citation rates? A bayesian examination C3. In Proceedings of ISSI 2013—14th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84896830466&partnerID=40&md5=960a18915c0fa828b5625ff9415a083c .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 913

Metadata

Authors
Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K.
Affiliations
Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2016-02-15
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
1195-1225
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2277805675
Cited by
912
References
212
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 8
FWCI
37.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
citation counts, paper quality, journal impact factor, number of authors, author reputation, self-citation, international cooperation, author productivity, research funding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review