The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Female academics continue to lag behind in terms of key output criteria, such as citations and visibility33–37.”
From Scientific publications that use promotional language in the abstract receive more citations and public attention (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“There are numerous factors affecting citation counts [270,271], which can be divided into (1) factors that are related to the paper, (2) factors related to the journal, and (3) factors related to the author [266,272].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [272]
In the citing paper
“This phenomenon can be well illustrated by the 80-20 rule describing that, usually, the top 20% of papers tend to receive 80% of total citations, while remaining publications are cited very scarcely, if cited at all [2,272].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [272]
In the citing paper
“For example, it has been shown in several studies that the importance of the journal in a field has an influence on the citation impact of the papers published in the journal (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Generally, citing authors assess selected documents based on several criteria, which are described in some previous studies (Wang and White, 1999, Tahamtan et al., 2016, Wang and Soergel, 1998).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Documents written by authors from specific countries, with specific races, and specific gender are selected for citing more frequently than others (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Researchers have differing attitudes toward quality, so that some consider accuracy and importance of research as higher quality, while for others it is creativity and novelty (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Several organizational features are reviewed by Tahamtan et al. (2016), including number of faculty members, number of published documents, number of productive and prestigious scholars in the department, rank of school or university, language of the institution, interdisciplinarity of the institutions, and the number of scholars in the organization.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“The nationality, race, age, and gender are also among the author's features by which the document value is assessed (Tahamtan et al., 2016).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Tahamtan et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770
Eysenbach, G. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2012 · Cited by 1,088
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974
Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308 · Cited by 881
The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations
Maliniak, D., Powers, R., & Walter, B. F. (2013) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000209 · Cited by 749
Callaham, M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847 · Cited by 644
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L. A., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636 · Cited by 602
(2014) · Wilderness and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2014.09.008 · Cited by 583
Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences
Patsopoulos, N. A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.19.2362 · Cited by 498
Characteristics of highly cited papers
Aksnes, D. W. (2003) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.3152/147154403781776645 · Cited by 493
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chu, H., & Krichel, T. (2007). Downloads vs. citations in economics: Relationships, contributing factors and beyond. Paper presented at the C3—Proceedings of ISSI 2007—11th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952034760&partnerID=40&md5=93cf9b04e77b4eab198b8568f50e8ca7 .
- Gallivan, M. J. (2012). Analyzing citation impact of IS research by women and men: Do women have higher levels of research impact? Paper presented at the C3—SIGMIS-CPR’12—Proceedings of the 2012 computers and people research conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863524757&partnerID=40&md5=d488810d10e756a2beaa3839e525e766 .
- Gomes, J. A. N. F., & Vieira, E. S. (2009). How to improve the citation impact of a paper: Choice of journal, co-authors and institutional addresses. Paper presented at the C3—12th International conference on scientometrics and informetrics, ISSI 2009. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84901983008&partnerID=40&md5=ec158d329d4c5e0b81b579636c7c36f3 .
- Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of book-based disciplines: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar and Scopus. In Proceedings of ISSI 2011: The 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 361–372.
- Schneider, J. W., & Henriksen, D. (2013). Are larger effect sizes in experimental studies good predictors of higher citation rates? A bayesian examination C3. In Proceedings of ISSI 2013—14th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84896830466&partnerID=40&md5=960a18915c0fa828b5625ff9415a083c .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 · Cited by 14,329
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao0185 · Cited by 1,497
A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research
Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010166 · Cited by 751
Baker, H. K., Pandey, N., Kumar, S., & Haldar, A. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025 · Cited by 622
Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers
Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F., & Livan, G. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13130-4 · Cited by 256
Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03243-4 · Cited by 236
Self-citationLangham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C., & Riegelman, A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253129 · Cited by 291
Soft Robotics: Academic Insights and Perspectives Through Bibliometric Analysis
Bao, G., Fang, H., Chen, L., Wan, Y., Xu, F., Yang, Q., & Zhang, L. (2018) · Soft Robotics · doi:10.1089/soro.2017.0135 · Cited by 203
Fox, C. W., & Paine, C. E. T. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4993 · Cited by 197
Sweileh, W. M. (2020) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00576-1 · Cited by 207
Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on antimicrobial stewardship from 1990 to 2019
Sweileh, W. M. (2021) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00651-7 · Cited by 162
Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature
Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.002 · Cited by 149
Self-citationDigital financial inclusion. Visualizing the academic literature
Gallego-Losada, M.-J., Montero, A., García-Abajo, E., & Losada, R. G. (2022) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101862 · Cited by 202
The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations
Guan, J., Yan, Y., & Zhang, J. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.007 · Cited by 146
Academic Review and Perspectives on Robotic Exoskeletons
Bao, G., Pan, L., Fang, H., Wu, X., Yu, H., Cai, S., Yu, B., & Wan, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2019.2944655 · Cited by 135
The relationship between bioRxiv preprints, citations and altmetrics
Fraser, N., Momeni, F., Mayr, P., & Peters, I. (2020) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00043 · Cited by 163
Cost-effectiveness of adult vaccinations: A systematic review
Leidner, A. J., Murthy, N. C., Chesson, H. W., Biggerstaff, M., Stoecker, C., Harris, A. M., Acosta, A. M., Dooling, K. L., & Bridges, C. B. (2018) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.056 · Cited by 139
Predicting the citation counts of individual papers via a BP neural network
Ruan, X., Zhu, Y., Jiang, L., & Cheng, Y. (2020) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101039 · Cited by 133
Cardillo, M. A. D. R., & Basso, L. F. C. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100648 · Cited by 213
Khare, A., & Jain, R. K. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.039 · Cited by 141
Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender
Mishra, S., Fegley, B. D., Diesner, J., & Torvik, V. I. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195773 · Cited by 126
Citation analysis of scientific categories
Patience, G. S., Patience, C. A., Blais, B., & Bertrand, F. (2017) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00300 · Cited by 114
A large-scale review of wave and tidal energy research over the last 20 years
Khojasteh, D., Shamsipour, A., Huang, L., Tavakoli, S., Haghani, M., Flocard, F., Farzadkhoo, M., Iglesias, G., Hemer, M., Lewis, M., et al. (2023) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114995 · Cited by 121
Journal rankings in management and business studies: What rules do we play by?
Vogel, R., Hattke, F., & Petersen, J. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.001 · Cited by 105
How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact
Larivière, V., & Costas, R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162709 · Cited by 115
González‐Alcaide, G., Park, J., Huamaní, C., & Ramos, J. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182513 · Cited by 98
Hadar, A. A., David, J., Shalit, N., Roseman, L., Gross, R., Sessa, B., & Lev‐Ran, S. (2022) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2021.2022254 · Cited by 103
Construction and Demolition Waste Management Research: A Science Mapping Analysis
Elshaboury, N., Al-Sakkaf, A., Abdelkader, E. M., & Alfalah, G. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19084496 · Cited by 105
Sweileh, W. M. (2020) · Agriculture & Food Security · doi:10.1186/s40066-020-00266-6 · Cited by 109
Sweileh, W. M. (2022) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-022-00803-x · Cited by 89
Citation recommendation: approaches and datasets
Färber, M., & Jatowt, A. (2020) · Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) · doi:10.5445/ir/1000123311 · Cited by 88
Vélez-Estévez, A., García‐Sánchez, P., Moral-Muñoz, J. A., & Cobo, M. J. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04486-4 · Cited by 117
Who Writes about Archaeology? An Intersectional Study of Authorship in Archaeological Journals
Heath-Stout, L. E. (2020) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2020.28 · Cited by 80
A systematic review of cyber-resilience assessment frameworks
Estay, D. A. S., Sahay, R., Barfod, M. B., & Jensen, C. D. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101996 · Cited by 85
Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
Mosleh, M., Roshani, S., & Coccia, M. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1 · Cited by 89
Sweileh, W. M. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09368-z · Cited by 94
Green human resource management: A comprehensive investigation using bibliometric analysis
Shah, P., Dubey, R. S., Rai, S., Renwick, D., & Misra, S. (2023) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2589 · Cited by 107
Citation recommendation: approaches and datasets
Färber, M., & Jatowt, A. (2020) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-020-00288-2 · Cited by 117
Revisiting the Scientometric Conceptualization of Impact and Its Measurement
Abramo, G. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.001 · Cited by 80
Lattice Boltzmann Method for Fluid-Thermal Systems: Status, Hotspots, Trends and Outlook
Li, L., Wan, Y., Lu, J., Fang, H., Yin, Z., Wang, T., Wang, R., Fan, X., Zhao, L., & Tan, D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2971546 · Cited by 79
Farsani, M. A., Jamali, H. R., Beikmohammadi, M., Ghorbani, B. D., & Soleimani, L. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102547 · Cited by 79
Riazi, A., & Farsani, M. A. (2023) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444823000332 · Cited by 37
Anthropomorphism and consumer behaviour: A SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol compliant hybrid review
Khan, F. M., Anas, M., & Uddin, S. M. F. (2023) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12985 · Cited by 99
Early indicators of scientific impact: Predicting citations with altmetrics
Akella, A. P., Alhoori, H., Kondamudi, P. R., Freeman, C., & Zhou, H. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101128 · Cited by 74
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.12.001 · Cited by 72
International review of financial analysis: A retrospective evaluation between 1992 and 2020
Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., Goyal, K., & Sharma, A. (2021) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101946 · Cited by 72
Bibliometric study on dividend policy
Pinto, G., Rastogi, S., Kadam, S., & Sharma, A. (2019) · Qualitative Research in Financial Markets · doi:10.1108/qrfm-11-2018-0118 · Cited by 70
Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advances
Ruan, X., Lyu, D., Gong, K., Cheng, Y., & Li, J. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121071 · Cited by 70
The funding-productivity-gender nexus in science, a multistage analysis
Lawson, C., Geuna, A., & Finardi, U. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104182 · Cited by 78
Basson, I., Blanckenberg, J. P., & Prozesky, H. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03734-9 · Cited by 77
Impact of the reference list features on the number of citations
Mammola, S., Fontaneto, D., Martínez, A., & Chichorro, F. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03759-0 · Cited by 67
The state of nursing research from 2000 to 2019: A global analysis
Su, Y., Hua, L., Liu, C., Wang, F., & Duan, Z. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14564 · Cited by 65
Yadav, N., Kumar, R., & Malik, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.005 · Cited by 65
Huang, G. I., Karl, M., Wong, I. A., & Law, R. (2022) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104686 · Cited by 74
Urban carbon accounting: An overview
Yin, L., Sharifi, A., Huang, L., & Chen, J. (2022) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101195 · Cited by 69
Science mapping analysis of embodied energy in the construction industry
Marzouk, M. M., & Elshaboury, N. (2021) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.049 · Cited by 62
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. A. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24810 · Cited by 74
FinTech in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A review and future research agenda
Verma, S. R., Shome, S., & Hassan, M. K. (2023) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2023.07.003 · Cited by 58
Zahedi, Z., Haustein, S., & S. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 57
Cation Exchange of Natural Zeolites: Worldwide Research
Morante-Carballo, F., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., & Espinoza-Santos, N. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13147751 · Cited by 66
Zahedi, Z., & Haustein, S. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.005 · Cited by 64
He, L., Fang, H., Chen, C., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Ge, H., Wang, L., Wan, Y., & He, H. (2020) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000019760 · Cited by 55
Systematic literature review of wave energy harvesting using triboelectric nanogenerator
Salman, M., Sorokin, V., & Aw, K. C. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114626 · Cited by 56
Oravec, J. A. (2019) · Review of higher education/The review of higher education · doi:10.1353/rhe.2019.0022 · Cited by 58
The association between topic growth and citation impact of research publications
Sjögårde, P., & Didegah, F. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04293-x · Cited by 69
Zanotto, S. R., Haeffner, C., & Guimarães, J. A. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2126-8 · Cited by 54
Shi, Y., Ramayah, T., Hongmei, L., Yifan, Z., & Wenhui, W. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19922 · Cited by 52
Bornmann, L., & Marewski, J. N. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03018-x · Cited by 56
Xie, J., Gong, K., Li, J., Ke, Q., Kang, H., & Cheng, Y. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03094-z · Cited by 52
Factors influencing scholarly publication productivity: a systematic review
Wahid, N., Warraich, N. F., & Tahira, M. (2021) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-04-2020-0036 · Cited by 49
Predicting the research performance of early career scientists
Lee, D. H. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03232-7 · Cited by 49
What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis
Momeni, F., Mayr, P., Fraser, N., & Peters, I. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03972-5 · Cited by 61
Entrepreneurial higher education institutions: Development of the research and future directions
Syed, R. T., Singh, D., & Spicer, D. P. (2022) · Higher Education Quarterly · doi:10.1111/hequ.12379 · Cited by 53
Research impact in co-authorship networks: a two-mode analysis
Dehdarirad, T., & Nasini, S. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.002 · Cited by 47
Alaba, P. A., Abbas, A., Huang, J., & Daud, W. M. A. W. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.106 · Cited by 48
Shen, H., Xie, J., Li, J., & Cheng, Y. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03888-0 · Cited by 56
Recent trends in business financial risk – A bibliometric analysis
Syed, A. M., & Bawazir, H. S. (2021) · Cogent Economics & Finance · doi:10.1080/23322039.2021.1913877 · Cited by 47
Data Market Design: A Systematic Literature Review
Driessen, S. W., Monsieur, G., & van den Heuvel, W. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3161478 · Cited by 47
Research evolution in banking performance: a bibliometric analysis
Alam, S., Chowdhury, M. A. M., & Razak, D. B. A. (2021) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-021-00111-7 · Cited by 45
The evolution of knowledge within and across fields in modern physics
Sun, Y., & Latora, V. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68774-w · Cited by 45
Global Research Activity on E-Learning in Health Sciences Education: a Bibliometric Analysis
Sweileh, W. M. (2021) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01254-6 · Cited by 45
Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field
Jirschitzka, J., Oeberst, A., Göllner, R., & Creß, U. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2516-6 · Cited by 47
Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method
Bolboacă, S. D., Buhai, D.-V., Aluaș, M., & Bulboacă, A. E. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217918 · Cited by 42
A Rare Case of Gender Parity in Academia
Lynn, F. B., Noonan, M. C., Sauder, M., & Andersson, M. A. (2018) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soy126 · Cited by 45
Which can better predict the future success of articles? Bibliometric indices or alternative metrics
Wang, M., Wang, Z., & Chen, G. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03052-9 · Cited by 44
The impact of heterogeneous shared leadership in scientific teams
Xu, H., Liu, M., Bu, Y., Sun, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Acuna, D. E., Gray, S., Meyer, E. T., & Ding, Y. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103542 · Cited by 42
Zhang, X., Xie, Q. S., & Song, M. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101140 · Cited by 42
Liu, D., Che, S., & Zhu, W. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211068510 · Cited by 42
Measuring the influence of non-scientific features on citations
Mammola, S., Piano, E., Doretto, A., Caprio, E., & Chamberlain, D. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04421-7 · Cited by 44
Qian, Y., Rong, W., Jiang, N., Tang, J., & Xiong, Z. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2235-4 · Cited by 41
Academic In-Group Bias: An Empirical Examination of the Link between Author and Journal Affiliation
Reingewertz, Y., & Lutmar, C. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.11.006 · Cited by 40
Bornmann, L., & Tekles, A. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101159 · Cited by 45
Five decades of the International Endodontic Journal: Bibliometric overview 1967–2020
Khan, A. S., Rehman, S. U., Ahmad, S., AlMaimouni, Y. K., Alzamil, M. A. S., & Dummer, P. M. H. (2021) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.13595 · Cited by 40
Ensuring tests of conservation interventions build on existing literature
Sutherland, W. J., Álvarez-Castañeda, S. T., Amano, T., Ambrosini, R., Atkinson, P. W., Baxter, J. M., Bond, A. L., Boon, P. J., Buchanan, K. L., Barlow, J., et al. (2020) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13555 · Cited by 39
The Journal Impact Factor: Moving Toward an Alternative and Combined Scientometric Approach
Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Yessirkepov, M., Udovik, E. E., Baryshnikov, A. A., & Kitas, G. D. (2017) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2017.32.2.173 · Cited by 44
The penalty of containing more non-English articles
Liu, F., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Liu, W. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2577-6 · Cited by 39
Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article
Herman, E., & Nicholas, D. (2019) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2019.ene.02 · Cited by 44
Main challenges to international student mobility in the European arena
López‐Duarte, C., Maley, J. F., & Suárez, M. M. V. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04155-y · Cited by 38
An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
Nakamura, R., Mann, L. S., Lindner, M. D., Braithwaite, J., Chen, M., Vancea, A., Byrnes, N., Durrant, V., & Reed, B. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.71368 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K.
- Affiliations
- Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- ORCID
- Tahamtan, Iman
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2016-02-15
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1195-1225
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2277805675
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 212
- Citations by year
- 2026: 97 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 37.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- citation counts, paper quality, journal impact factor, number of authors, author reputation, self-citation, international cooperation, author productivity, research funding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
