Cited by 118Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Social comparison and the ‘circle of objectification’

Open access
Lindner, Danielle, Tantleff-Dunn, Stacey, Jentsch, Florian·2012·Sex Roles

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-012-0175-x

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindner, D., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Jentsch, F.
Affiliations
University of Central Florida (US)
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2012-05-27
Volume
67
Issue
3-4
Pages
222-235
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W2069477161
Cited by
117
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
self-objectification, social comparison, body image disturbance, disordered eating, body shame, body dissatisfaction, eating disorders, women, young women, theoretical model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review