Cited by 168Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale in a New Zealand Sample

Hone, Lucy, Jarden, Aaron, Schofield, Grant·2014·Social Indicators Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-013-0501-x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hone, L., Jarden, A., & Schofield, G.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hone, Lucy
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
2013-11-06
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
1031-1045
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W2031678492
Cited by
168
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
Flourishing Scale, psychological flourishing, psychometric properties, scale validation, factor structure, reliability statistics, validity, population norms, well-being measurement, New Zealand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review