Cited by 129Social and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessHigher Education Research Studies

The consequences of stereotype threat on the academic performance of White and non-White lower income college students

Harrison, Lisa A., Stevens, Chiesha M., Monty, Adrienne N., Coakley, Christine A.·2006·Social Psychology of Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11218-005-5456-6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, L. A., Stevens, C. M., Monty, A. N., & Coakley, C. A.
Affiliations
California State University, Sacramento (US)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Lisa A.
Venue
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2006-08
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
341-357
ISSN
  • 1381-2890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1928
OpenAlex
W2001012208
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
stereotype threat, socioeconomic status, low-income students, academic performance, test anxiety, effort, subject identification, self-esteem, cognitive dissonance theory, race, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review