The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“epistemic injustice related to AI is a growing concern.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The opacity of the process [20] leading to the outcome makes the assessment of the truthfulness of the outcome uncertain.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Objective Knowledge, an Evolutionary Approach.
Ruja, H., & Popper, K. R. (1973) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2106696 · Cited by 3,782
Demopoulos, W., & van Fraassen, B. C. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184804 · Cited by 3,317
Rudolf, R. (1998) · Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks · doi:10.28937/978-3-7873-2358-6 · Cited by 1,073
Leftow, B., & The Society of Christian Philosophers (1996) · Faith and Philosophy · doi:10.5840/faithphil19961323 · Cited by 765
On proof and progress in mathematics
Thurston, W. P. H. (1994) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-1994-00502-6 · Cited by 655
Quantum Computer Science: An Introduction
Mermin, N. D. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813870 · Cited by 592
Humphreys, P. W. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195158709.001.0001 · Cited by 559
Self-citationExtending ourselves: computational science, empiricism, and scientific method
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0272 · Cited by 487
van Fraassen, B. C. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127966 · Cited by 377
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bedau M. (1997) Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 11: 375–399
- Costas, H.-A. (forthcoming). Review of Humphreys [2004], Mind.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–362 of 362
Modelle des Demos. Hybride Repräsentation und die Politik der Inferenzen
Eyert, F. (2024) · Politologische Aufklärung - konstruktivistische Perspektiven · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-42936-2_5
Duede, E., & Davey, K. J. (2025) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2025.10160
Lenhard, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190873288.002.0004
Experimental high-energy physics without computer simulations
Krämer, M., Schiemann, G., & Zeitnitz, C. (2024) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.05.001
Explainable Medical AI: An Assessment of Developments
Durán, J. M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_85-1
Epistemic implications of machine learning models in science
Buijsman, S., & Durán, J. M. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003205647-39 · Cited by 2
Pättiniemi, I., & Koskinen, R. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003205647-38
Schweer, J., Hillerbrand, R., & Elstner, M. (2024) · J.B. Metzler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-05991-8_33
Deep Learning in Science: Is there a Reason for (Philosophical) Pessimism?
Justin, M. (2024) · Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems · doi:10.7906/indecs.22.1.3
Assessing Vickers’ Plea for Identifying Future-Proof Science
Martínez-Ordaz, M. D. R., & Cañas, D. (2025) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-024-09696-3
It’s not just the Web, It’s the Spider as well: Prioritising Education over Structural Changes
Pavličić, J., & Nedeljković, A. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2025.27
Closing the Empirical Loop: Autonomous AI Agents Conduct End‐to‐end Research With Human Participants
Wehr, G., Rideaux, R., Fox, A. J., Lightfoot, D. R., Tangen, J. M., Mattingley, J. B., & Ehrhardt, S. E. (2026) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.76675
Hashagen, U. (2025) · Die blaue Stunde der Informatik/Die blaue Stunde der Informatik · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-35560-9_2
Explainable Medical AI: An Assessment of Developments
Durán, J. M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2252-8_85
Assessing the Meta-Laws of Scientific ExistencePreprint
Wu, C. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5582830
Park, S. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas65609.2025.11269653
Dlugatch, R., Georgieva, A., & Kerasidou, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24954509
Conceptual Disconnect: The Prospect of Concept-Based AI Explanations
Buijsman, S. (2025) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99654-2_1
Styger, S. A., Kloots, M. D. H., van der Wal, O., & Federica Russo, B. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03083-2_15
Zednik, C., & Verreault-Julien, P. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03083-2_6 · Cited by 1
Representation Learning Without Representationalism
Kieval, P. H. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03083-2_12 · Cited by 2
Crook, B., & Kästner, L. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03083-2_20
The Limits of Human Knowledge and Transcendence from the Perspective of the Epistemic Opacity
郭艳娜 (2025) · Advances in Philosophy · doi:10.12677/acpp.2026.151007
Schmidt, M., & Blatt, H. (2026) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-026-09759-y
The Black Box Metaphor in Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition: A Philosophical PerspectivePreprint
Mattioli, M., Ciná, A. E., & Pelillo, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6254420
Saba, L. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44728-0.00023-8
Accuracy is not all you need! The Reasons to Require AI Explainability
Buijsman, S. (2026) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-026-09768-x · Cited by 1
McCallion, B. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6242458
Santacruz, J. J. I. (2026) · Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) · doi:10.5209/resf.105008
Can Machines Think Like Humans: A Behavioral Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dictator Games
Ma, J. (2026) · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1017/s0957876526000173 · Cited by 1
L'intuitionnisme dialogique. Une autre lecture du sujet créateur brouwerien
Lion, C. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/b38200baz2c26z4b2az969czf05b69a11d2c
Rusconi, M., Secchi, D., & Seri, R. (2026) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2026.2617538
The Cost of Prediction: How Computational Methods Compromise Reproducibility
Lenhard, J., Stephan, S., & Hasse, H. (2026) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11706-9_12
Khatun, S. (2026) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18871-7_18
On the Ethical Role of Explainability in Artificial Intelligence
Cortese, J. F. N. B. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15112-4_11
Epistemic Defeat and the Ethics of Machine Learning
Begley, K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15112-4_14
Ethische Grundlagen: Medizinethik und Datenethik
Rubeis, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14301-3_4
From Philosophy to Regulation: The Global Evolution of AI Ethics
Andrade, R., Ayala, C., & Morillo, P. (2026) · Synthesis lectures on computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25789-5_2
Critical Domains of AI Deployment: Ethical Stakes and Engineering Challenges
Andrade, R., Ayala, C., & Morillo, P. (2026) · Synthesis lectures on computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25789-5_1
Chemistry Students’ Epistemic Practices in Reasoning About Black-Box Molecular Dynamics SimulationsPreprint
Thiel, M., Kolodzeiski, E., Roemelt, M., Podewitz, M., Tiemann, R., Zupan, H., Schaefer, J.-L., & Krewald, V. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6875451
The Communication Approach within the Paradigm of Systems Thinking
Artamonov, D. S., Алексеевич, Б. В., Kazakov, A. A., & Melnichuk, D. (2026) · Issues of Media Business · doi:10.65324/imb029
García-Hidalgo, C. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03154-y
Predictive ignorance: Using machine learning to predict what we do not understand
Naser, M. Z. (2026) · TAO. · doi:10.1016/j.tao.2026.100033
Token Trajectories as Knowledge Representation in Large Language Models
Maciąg, R. (2026) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies11040116
Mohanty, P., & Mishra, S. (2026) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.71333
The End of Theory in Social Science? AI and Sleepwalking into Epistemic SurrenderPreprint
Smith, A. N., & Humphries, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6807338
Mystics Against the Machine: The Sacrifice and Ecstasy of AI Refusal
Keefe, R. (2026) · Peitho. · doi:10.37514/pei-j.2026.28.4.05
Cat, J. (2026) · Studies in history and philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25925-7_3
Representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. A (weakly) pragmatist account
Díez, J. A. (2026) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-026-00759-4
Musin, A. I., Samoilov, V. N., & Aristarkhov, P. V. (2026) · Journal of Surface Investigation X-ray Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques · doi:10.1134/s1027451026700783
Friedman, M. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100386
The Human-Machine Knowledge Gap: When Knowledge Moves beyond Human UnderstandingPreprint
Albrecht, A., & Shellhous, E. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7341698
Is Design Inference Epistemically Special?
Nourbakhshi, H. (2026) · Sophia · doi:10.1007/s11841-026-01171-4
Rethinking Epistemic Trust in the Use of AI in Education
BAYRAKLI, V. K., Demircioğlu, A., & Ertek, Z. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-1232-1.ch002
Making and Knowing: On the Alleged First Principles of Bioscience and Biotechnology
Huang, K.-C. (2026) · London Journal of Research In Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.34257/ljrhss231564uk
Navigating AI-Accelerated Science: An Intellectual Virtue Approach to Responsible Inquiry
Sikimić, V. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10140
Schäffer, B., Lieder, F. R., & Krämer, F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-53148-5_10
Die Zukunft qualitativer Sozialforschung und ihrer Vermittlung zusammen mit KI
Schäffer, B., Lieder, F. R., & Krämer, F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-53148-5_8
Verteilte Interpretation: Grundlagen einer hybriden qualitativ-rekonstruktiven Forschung
Schäffer, B., Lieder, F. R., & Krämer, F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-53148-5_6
Sawyer, C. (2026) · Science Fiction Studies · doi:10.1525/sfs.2026.53.3.553
Metadata
- Authors
- Humphreys, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Humphreys, Paul
- Venue
- Synthese
- Published
- 2008-11-28
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 615-626
- ISSN
- 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0964
- OpenAlex
- W2055250996
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 28.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Synthese (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- computer simulation, scientific computing, scientific method, philosophy of science, epistemology of simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review