Cited by 60Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect Resistance and GeneticsCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

Decomposition dynamics and structural plant components of genetically modified Bt maize leaves do not differ from leaves of conventional hybrids

Open access
Zurbrügg, Corinne, Hönemann, Linda, Meissle, Michael, Romeis, Jörg, Nentwig, Wolfgang·2010·Transgenic Research

Abstract

The cultivation of genetically modified Bt maize has raised environmental concerns, as large amounts of plant residues remain in the field and may negatively impact the soil ecosystem. In a field experiment, decomposition of leaf residues from three genetically modified (two expressing the Cry1Ab, one the Cry3Bb1 protein) and six non-transgenic hybrids (the three corresponding non-transformed near-isolines and three conventional hybrids) was investigated using litterbags. To elucidate the mechanisms that cause differences in plant decomposition, structural plant components (i.e., C:N ratio, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose) were examined. Furthermore, Cry1Ab and Cry3Bb1 protein concentrations in maize leaf residues were measured from harvest to the next growing season. While leaf residue decomposition in transgenic and non-transgenic plants was similar, differences among conventional cultivars were evident. Similarly, plant components among conventional hybrids differed more than between transgenic and non-transgenic hybrids. Moreover, differences in senescent plant material collected directly from plants were larger than after exposure to soil for 5 months. While the concentration of Cry3Bb1 was higher in senescent maize leaves than that of Cry1Ab, degradation was faster, indicating that Cry3Bb1 has a shorter persistence in plant residues. As decomposition patterns of Bt-transgenic maize were shown to be well within the range of common conventional hybrids, there is no indication of ecologically relevant, adverse effects on the activity of the decomposer community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11248-009-9304-x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zurbrügg, C., Hönemann, L., Meissle, M., Romeis, J., & Nentwig, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Agroscope (CH)
Corresponding author
Zurbrügg, Corinne
Venue
Transgenic Research
Published
2009-07-17
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
257-267
ISSN
  • 0962-8819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9368
OpenAlex
W2084758998
Cited by
60
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transgenic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
Bt maize, leaf litter decomposition, genetically modified crops, Cry1Ab, Cry3Bb1, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, C/N ratio, litterbags, senescent leaves
MeSH terms
Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Chimera, Zea mays, Endotoxins, Hemolysin Proteins, Lepidoptera, Pest Control, Biological, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Ecosystem, Plant Structures, Plant Leaves, Plant Stems, Risk Assessment, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review