Cited by 31Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlInsect Resistance and Genetics

Development of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on pollen from Bt-transgenic and conventional maize

Open access
Meissle, Michael, Zünd, Jan, Waldburger, Mario, Romeis, Jörg·2014·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays) pollen is highly nutritious and can be used by predatory arthropods to supplement or replace a carnivorous diet. We demonstrate that maize pollen can be utilized by larvae of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under laboratory conditions. Complete development on maize pollen was not possible, but 25% of neonates reached the third instar. When only one instar was fed with pollen and the other two instars with eggs of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), 58-87% of the larvae reached the pupal stage. The experiments included pollen produced by nine cultivars: three genetically modified (GM) cultivars expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis proteins Cry1Ab or Cry3Bb1, their corresponding non-transformed near-isolines, and three conventional cultivars. Maize cultivars were grown in two batches in a glasshouse. Their pollen differed by up to 59% in total protein content, 25% in C:N ratio, and 14% in grain diameter, but the differences were inconsistent and depended on the batch. Lacewing performance was not affected by maize cultivar. For environmental risk assessment of GM plants, in planta studies must consider the variability among conventional cultivars, individual plants, batches, and environmental conditions when evaluating the ecological significance of differences observed between GM and near-isolines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep05900

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies with Bt maize pollen from events MON810 and Bt11 lacked exposure given very low concentrations of Cry proteins in pollen of this event.

    “Studies conducted with Bt maize pollen from events MON810 and Bt11 (Meissle et al., 2014;Obrist et al., 2006c) also lacked exposure given the very low concentrations of Cry proteins in the pollen of this event (Dutton et al., 2003;Nguyen and Jehle, 2007).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Meissle et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stanley R. G. & Linskens H. F. Pollen. Biology, Biochemistry, Management (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1974).
  2. Principi M. M. & Canard M. Feeding habits. in Biology of Chrysopidae. Canard, M., Séméria, Y. & New, T. R. (eds.) 76– 92 (Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, 1984).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meissle, M., Zünd, J., Waldburger, M., & Romeis, J.
Affiliations
Agroscope (CH)
Corresponding author
Meissle, Michael
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2014-07-31
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
5900-5900
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003776209
Cited by
31
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agroscope
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
Keywords
Chrysoperla carnea, green lacewings, maize pollen, Bt maize, genetically modified crops, Cry1Ab, Cry3Bb1, Ephestia kuehniella eggs, larval development, alternative prey, non-target arthropods, environmental risk assessment, pollen protein content, C/N ratio
MeSH terms
Animals, Zea mays, Endotoxins, Feeding Behavior, Insecta, Nutritional Requirements, Plant Proteins, Pollen, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review