The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding and applying the dynamics of test practice and study practice
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Optimizing scheduling is a more specific version of the spacing principle and builds on Pavlik's (2007) observation that much past research has not controlled for time on task and thus has underestimated the benefit of shorter practice intervals early in KC acquisition.”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Pavlik (2007)
In the citing paper
“The strategy of creating a student-adaptive version of a principle by applying a knowledge analysis could be applied not only to adaptive fading of worked examples as described above, but also to other principles as Pavlik (2007) has demonstrated for the spacing effect.”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Pavlik (2007)
Citations
Cites
When Does Feedback Facilitate Learning of Words?
Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3 · Cited by 445
The spacing effect: consolidation or differential encoding?
Bjork, R. A., & Allen, T. W. (1970) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(70)80103-7 · Cited by 160 · cited 2×
“Interference has been shown to increase spacing effects (Bjork & Allen, 1970).”
BackgroundEffect of spacing presentations on retention of a paired associate over short intervals.
Peterson, L. R., Wampler, R., Kirkpatrick, M., & Saltzman, D. (1963) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046694 · Cited by 117
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Allen G.A., Mahler W.A., Estes W.K. (1969) Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8:463–470 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson J.R., Lebiere C. (1998) The Atomic Components of Thought. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US
- Anderson J.R., Schooler L.J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science 2:396–408 · DOI
- Atkinson R.C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in 2nd-language learning. American Psychologist 30:821–828 · DOI
- Atkinson R.C., Raugh M.R. (1975) An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 104:126–133 · DOI
- Baddeley A., Lewis V., Eldridge M., Thomson N. (1984) Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113:518–540 · DOI · Paper page
- Bahrick H.P. (1979) Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108:296–308 · DOI · Paper page
- Bentin S., Moscovitch M., Nirhod O. (1998) Levels of processing and selective attention effects on encoding in memory. Acta Psychologica 98:311–341 · DOI
- Carrier M., Pashler H. (1992) The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition 20:633–642 · DOI
- Coltheart M. (1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 33:497–505. · DOI
- Cooper E.H., Pantle A.J. (1967). The total-time hypothesis in verbal learning. Psychological Bulletin 68(4):221–234 · DOI
- Crutcher R.J., Ericsson K.A. (2000). The role of mediators in memory retrieval as a function of practice: Controlled mediation to direct access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26:1297–1317 · DOI
- Cull W.L. (2000) Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14:215–235 · DOI
- Cull W.L., Shaughnessy J.J., Zechmeister E.B. (1996) Expanding our understanding of the expanding pattern of retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2:365–378. · DOI
- Dempster F.N. (1989). Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educational Psychology Review 1:309–330 · DOI
- Fishman, E.J., Keller, L. & Atkinson, R.C. (1969). Massed versus distributed practice in computerized spelling drills. In R. Atkinson & H.A. Wilson, eds, Computer assisted instruction. New York: Academic Press.
- Glenberg A.M. (1976) Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15:1–16 · DOI · Paper page
- Hogan R.M., Kintsch W. (1971) Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10:562–567 · DOI
- Kane M.J., Engle R.W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26:336–358. · DOI
- Landauer T.K., Bjork R.A. (1978) Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In: Gruneberg M.M., Morris P.E., Sykes R.N. (eds) Practical aspects of memory. Academic Press, New York, pp. 625–632
- Martin E. (1968) Stimulus meaningfulness and paired-associate transfer: An encoding variability hypothesis. Psychological Review 75:421–441 · DOI
- McBride D.M., Dosher B.A. (1997) A comparison of forgetting in an implicit and explicit memory task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126:371–392 · DOI
- Metcalfe J., Kornell N. (2003) The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132:530–542 · DOI · Paper page
- Pavlik Jr., P.I. (in press). Timing is an order: Modeling order effects in the learning of information. In F.E. Ritter, J. Nerb, T. O’Shea & E. Lehtinen, eds, In order to learn: how ordering effects in machine learning illuminate human learning and vice versa. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Pavlik Jr., P.I. & Anderson, J.R. (2005). Practice and forgetting effects on vocabulary memory: An activation-based model of the spacing effect. Cognitive Science 29: 559–586. · DOI
- Pimsleur P. (1967) A memory schedule. Modern Language Journal 51:73–75 · DOI
- Raiijmakers J.W. (2005) [Practice and forgetting effects on vocabulary memory: An activation-based model of the spacing effect.] Cognitive Science 29:559–586 · DOI
- Runquist W. (1983). Some effects of remembering on forgetting. Memory and Cognition 11:641–650 · DOI · Paper page
- Slamecka N.J., Katsaiti L.T. (1988). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of prior testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14:716–727 · DOI
- Thompson C.P., Wenger S.K., Bartling C.A. (1978). How recall facilitates subsequent recall: A reappraisal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4:210–221 · DOI · Paper page
- Underwood B.J. (1970). A breakdown of the total-time law in free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 9:573–580 · DOI
- Wang A.Y., Thomas M.H. (1995). Effect of keywords on long-long retention: Help or hindrance? Journal of Educational Psychology 87:468–475 · DOI
- Wang A.Y., Thomas M.H. (1999). In defense of keyword experiments: A reply to Gruneberg’s commentary. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13:283–287 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 · Cited by 1,796
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772
Metadata
- Authors
- Pavlik, P. I.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pavlik, Philip I.
- ORCID
- Pavlik, Philip I.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2006-11-14
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 407-441
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2160231112
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- test practice, study habits, ACT-R, declarative memory, computational models of learning, study duration, mnemonic strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
