The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“an engagement in covert, subjectmatter related cognitive processes might be more responsible for subject-matterrelated knowledge (e.g., Stegmann et al., 2012).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Stegmann et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion
Weiner, B. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548 · Cited by 7,846
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Similarity and Analogical Reasoning
(1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529863 · Cited by 2,416
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1 · Cited by 1,341
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
Walton, D., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 1,201
Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003 · Cited by 948
Self-citationCognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning
O’Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603715 · Cited by 879
(2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203052174-11 · Cited by 741
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school. In A. M. O’Donnel & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 117–149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748005 · Cited by 525
Self-citationNoroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006 · Cited by 310
Self-citationSocio-Cognitive Scaffolding with Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts: a Meta-Analysis
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7 · Cited by 278
Self-citationArgumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
Habernal, I., & Gurevych, I. (2016) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00276 · Cited by 272
Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D. W., & Fischer, F. (2018) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9292-z · Cited by 205
Self-citationFacilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013 · Cited by 192
Self-citationHabernal, I., & Gurevych, I. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1150 · Cited by 205
Sung, Y., Yang, J.-M., & Lee, H.-Y. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317704307 · Cited by 197
Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay
Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002 · Cited by 176
Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z · Cited by 183
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13054 · Cited by 163
Vicarious learning during simulations: is it more effective than hands‐on training?
Stegmann, K., Pilz, F., Siebeck, M., & Fischer, F. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04344.x · Cited by 152
Self-citationRadkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4 · Cited by 152
Self-citationLearning analytics dashboards for adaptive support in face-to-face collaborative argumentation
Han, J., Kim, K. H., Rhee, W., & Cho, Y. H. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104041 · Cited by 141
Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., & Baker, M. J. (2017) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.003 · Cited by 143
ArgueTutor: An Adaptive Dialog-Based Learning System for Argumentation Skills
Wambsganss, T., Kueng, T., Soellner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445781 · Cited by 138
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hußmann, H., Pekrun, R. H., Neuhaus, B. J., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M. R., et al. (2014) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v2i2.96 · Cited by 125
Self-citationFacilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts
Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2012) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9162-z · Cited by 116
Self-citationLatifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032 · Cited by 107
AL: An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation Skills
Wambsganss, T., Niklaus, C., Cetto, M., Söllner, M., Handschuh, S., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376732 · Cited by 101
Multimodal learning analytics of collaborative patterns during pair programming in higher education
Xu, W., Wu, Y., & Ouyang, F. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00377-z · Cited by 98
Providing different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning
Schnaubert, L., & Bodemer, D. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9293-y · Cited by 93
Greenhow, C. M., Gibbins, T., & Menzer, M. M. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.031 · Cited by 91
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K. M., & Fischer, F. (2016) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9380-2 · Cited by 85
Self-citationMu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C. P., & Fischer, F. (2012) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9147-y · Cited by 78
Self-citationKollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. M. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003 · Cited by 84
Self-citationZheng, L., Niu, J., & Zhong, L. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13156 · Cited by 79
Erkens, M., & Bodemer, D. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.009 · Cited by 85
Enhancing argumentative writing with automated feedback and social comparison nudging
Wambsganß, T., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104644 · Cited by 93
Guiding classroom discussions for democratic citizenship education
Schuitema, J. A., Radstake, H., van de Pol, J., & Veugelers, W. (2017) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2017.1373629 · Cited by 91
Lee, J., & Recker, M. M. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104084 · Cited by 68
Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education
Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2081209 · Cited by 80
Backer, L. D., Keer, H. V., Smedt, F. D., Merchie, E., & Valcke, M. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104421 · Cited by 77
Individual versus collaborative problem solving: divergent outcomes depending on task complexity
Sears, D. A., & Reagin, J. M. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9271-8 · Cited by 64
Promoting critical, elaborative discussions through a collaboration script and argument diagrams
Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M., Weinberger, A., & Niebuhr, S. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9274-5 · Cited by 61
Self-citationThe effect of social media use on work‐related learning
van Puijenbroek, T., Poell, R. F., Kroon, B., & Timmerman, V. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12037 · Cited by 61
Backer, L. D., Keer, H. V., & Valcke, M. (2021) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101527 · Cited by 66
Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.067 · Cited by 54
Self-citationHaro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2020) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720537.2020.1734995 · Cited by 66
Towards another kind of borderlessness: online students with disabilities
Kotera, Y., Cockerill, V., Green, P., Hutchinson, L., Shaw, P., & Bowskill, N. (2019) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1600369 · Cited by 50
de Zúñiga, H. G., Borah, P., & Goyanes, M. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106803 · Cited by 49
Tsovaltzi, D., Puhl, T., Judele, R., & Weinberger, A. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.012 · Cited by 43
Self-citationFischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., et al. (2014) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v2i3.96 · Cited by 42
Self-citationZheng, X., Huang, J., Xia, X.-H., Hwang, G., Tu, Y., Huang, Y.-P., & Wang, F. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104920 · Cited by 49
Slof, B., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12466 · Cited by 43
Tang, K., Tsai, C., & Lin, T. (2014) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-014-9196-5 · Cited by 40
‘Make it explicit!’: Improving collaboration through increase of script coercion
Papadopoulos, P. M., Demetriadis, S., & Weinberger, A. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12014 · Cited by 40
Self-citationAlmahdawi, M., Senghore, S., Ambrin, H., & Belbase, S. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11110672 · Cited by 39
Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2019.1612772 · Cited by 43
Nistor, N., Trăușan-Matu, Ș., Dascălu, M., Duttweiler, H., Chiru, C.-G., Baltes, B., & Smeaton, G. L. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.029 · Cited by 35
Scripted collaborative drawing in elementary science education
van Dijk, A. M., Gijlers, H., & Weinberger, A. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9286-1 · Cited by 33
Self-citationInducing socio-cognitive conflict in Finnish and German groups of online learners by CSCL script
Weinberger, A., Marttunen, M. J., Laurinen, L. I., & Stegmann, K. (2013) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9173-4 · Cited by 32
Self-citationImproving Students’ Argumentation Skills Using Dynamic Machine-Learning–Based Modeling
Wambsganß, T., Janson, A., Söllner, M., Koedinger, K. R., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.0615 · Cited by 46
Chen, D., Zhang, Y., Luo, H., Zhu, Z., Ma, J., & Lin, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-024-09418-3 · Cited by 31
Online collaborative learning in dyads: Effects of knowledge distribution and awareness
Kozlov, M. D., & Große, C. S. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.043 · Cited by 28
Yılmaz, R., Yılmaz, F. G. K., & Çakmak, E. K. (2016) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1224905 · Cited by 28
Collaboration Scripts: Guiding, Internalizing, and Adapting
Vogel, F., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_18 · Cited by 28
Self-citationSun, D., Looi, C., Yang, Y., & Jia, F. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13492 · Cited by 42
Mediators and Moderators in Individual and Collaborative Writing to Learn
Klein, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.08 · Cited by 26
Balakrishnan, B. (2014) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.21605 · Cited by 24
Chen, W., Hu, H., Lyu, Q., & Zheng, L. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13078 · Cited by 26
Exploring turn-taking patterns during dialogic collaborative problem solving
Hu, L., & Chen, G. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09565-2 · Cited by 22
Zheng, L., Huang, R., Hwang, G., & Yang, K.-C. (2015) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 21
Blending Facebook discussions into seminars for practicing argumentation
Puhl, T., Tsovaltzi, D., & Weinberger, A. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.006 · Cited by 21
Self-citationHong, H., Lin, P.-Y., & Lee, Y. (2019) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101787 · Cited by 21
Improving Students Argumentation Learning with Adaptive Self-Evaluation Nudging
Wambsganß, T., Janson, A., Käser, T., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555633 · Cited by 20
Hwang, W., Li, Y., & Shadiev, R. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.015 · Cited by 20
Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.004 · Cited by 20
Self-citationArgumentation and Knowledge Construction
Kimmerle, J., Fischer, F., & Creß, U. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_10 · Cited by 22
Self-citationLyu, Q., Chen, W., Su, J., & Heng, J. (2023) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100920 · Cited by 19
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18
“Given our observation that most studies we included strongly focused on overt processes that occur during peer-feedback, an engagement in covert, subject-matter related cognitive processes might be more responsible for subject-matter-related knowledge (e.g., Stegmann et al., 2012).”
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Productive Peer Talk Moves
Hu, L., & Chen, G. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-023-09513-9 · Cited by 19
Online collaborative learning: does it improve college students’ critical reading skills?
Koşar, G. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1998137 · Cited by 17
The Effect of Modeling Activities on Grade 5 Students’ Informal Reasoning About a Real-Life Issue
Demir, A., & Namdar, B. (2019) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09896-8 · Cited by 21
KALIN, B., & Namdar, B. (2022) · Turkish Journal of Education · doi:10.19128/turje.980874 · Cited by 14
Postdigital Citizenship Education
Rapanta, C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_40-1 · Cited by 14
Chen, W., Lyu, Q., & Su, J. (2024) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2024.2397761 · Cited by 13
Wu, L., Li, J., Liu, Q., He, L., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2021) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633121994939 · Cited by 13
Learning Through Collaborative Argumentation
Srinivasa, K. G., Kurni, M., & Saritha, K. (2022) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6734-4_3 · Cited by 16
Measuring and Visualizing Group Knowledge Elaboration in Online Collaborative Discussions
Zheng, Y., Xu, C., Li, Y., & Su, Y. (2018) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 12
The Impacts of Domain-General vs. Domain-Specific Diagramming Tools on Writing
Barstow, B., Fazio, L. K., Lippman, J. P., Falakmasir, M. H., Schunn, C. D., & Ashley, K. D. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0130-z · Cited by 12
The Myth of Over-scripting: Can Novices be Supported Too Much?
Stegmann, K., Mu, J., Gehlen‐Baum, V., & Fischer, F. (2011) · Computer Supported Collaborative Learning · Cited by 11
Self-citationMirzababaei, B., & Pammer-Schindler, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.645516 · Cited by 14
Scaffolding Argumentation in Asynchronous Online Discussion
Kim, H. S., & Oh, E. G. (2018) · International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design · doi:10.4018/ijopcd.2018040103 · Cited by 11
Hu, L. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100964 · Cited by 10
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55754-9_17 · Cited by 12
Self-citationArgumentation Models for Usability Problem Analysis in Individual and Collaborative Settings
Hvannberg, E. Þ., Law, E. L., & Halldórsdóttir, G. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1454142 · Cited by 10
Using an integrated discourse analysis approach to analyze a group's collaborative argumentation
Ouyang, F., Tang, Z., Cheng, M., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101227 · Cited by 9
Improving pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills: A holistic online scaffolding design approach
Ucar-Longford, B., Hosein, A., & Heron, M. (2024) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2024.2320440 · Cited by 8
Exploring students' computer‐supported collaborative argumentation with socio‐scientific issues
Chen, W., Han, Y., Tan, J. S. H., Chai, A. S. C., Lyu, Q., & Lyna, L. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13073 · Cited by 6
Lin, Y.-T., Chen, M., Chang, C.-H., & Chang, P.-C. (2017) · International Journal of Distance Education Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijdet.2017070105 · Cited by 7
Gallo, C., Fowlin, J. M., & Lilja, M. (2018) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2018.1426774 · Cited by 6
Teachers' Perspectives on Using Technology to Facilitate Pupil Participation
Öberg, J., Fors, U., & Zdravković, J. (2024) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v19i02.45931 · Cited by 6
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Strohmaier, A., Reiss, K. M., & Fischer, F. (2021) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098 · Cited by 7
Self-citationSoftware Tools for Scaffolding Argumentation Competence Development
Noroozi, O., & McAlister, S. (2016) · Technical and vocational education and training · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_38 · Cited by 7
Telenius, M., Iiskala, T., Laakkonen, E., & Vauras, M. (2025) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.70004 · Cited by 6
An Empirical Study of the Virtual Simulation System Teaching Method in NC Machining
Li, J., Li, Y., Bao, H., Yu, C., & Guo, H. (2020) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijthi.2020070107 · Cited by 5
Digital Tools for Written Argumentation
Benetos, K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_6 · Cited by 5
Students’ appropriation of collaboration script in a networked class: an exploratory study
Chen, W., Zhang, S., Pi, Z., Tan, J. S. H., Wen, Y., Looi, C., Yeo, J., & Liu, Q. (2023) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2023.2256348 · Cited by 5
Learners' acceptance of mobile technology supported collaborative learning
Lai, C. H., Chu, C.-M., Luo, P. P., & Chen, W. H. (2013) · International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation · doi:10.1504/ijmlo.2013.057166 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Saarland University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Stegmann, Karsten
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2011-07-15
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297-323
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2103258272
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- collaborative argumentation, cognitive elaboration, computer-supported collaborative learning, online discourse, deep processing, argumentation instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review