The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“an engagement in covert, subjectmatter related cognitive processes might be more responsible for subject-matterrelated knowledge (e.g., Stegmann et al., 2012).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Stegmann et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion
Weiner, B. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548 · Cited by 7,846
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Similarity and Analogical Reasoning
(1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529863 · Cited by 2,416
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1 · Cited by 1,341
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
Walton, D., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 1,201
Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003 · Cited by 948
Self-citationCognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning
O’Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603715 · Cited by 879
(2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203052174-11 · Cited by 741
Levels of processing: Past, present... and future?
Craik, F. I. M. (2002) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210244000135 · Cited by 692
Schank, R. C. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527920 · Cited by 669
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998) · Mind, Culture, and Activity · doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0503_3 · Cited by 662
Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2 · Cited by 561
Self-citationAndriessen, J. E. B., Baker, M. J., & Suthers, D. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7 · Cited by 487
Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning
Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. K. (1997) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1 · Cited by 480
Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology
Nix, D. H., & Spiro, R. J. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 453
Epistemic and social scripts in computer?supported collaborative learning
Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4 · Cited by 449
Self-citationMeans, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1 · Cited by 448
The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building
Leitão, S. (2000) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000022695 · Cited by 433
New approaches to instruction: because wisdom can't be told
Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529863.022 · Cited by 404
Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment
Baker, M. J., & Lund, K. (1997) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00019.x · Cited by 359
Resnick, L. Β., Salmon, M. H., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. A. (1993) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.1993.9649029 · Cited by 354
Rosé, C., Wang, Y.-C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2008) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9034-0 · Cited by 351
Self-citationKnowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007 · Cited by 304
Self-citationWalton, D., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995) · Cited by 279
Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y · Cited by 265
Self-citationAndriessen, J. E. B. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833.027 · Cited by 261
Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not)
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.007 · Cited by 245
Self-citationInternal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021 · Cited by 242
Self-citationThe Structure of Discourse in Collaborative Learning
Chinn, C. A., O’Donnell, A. M., & Jinks, T. S. (2000) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220970009600650 · Cited by 217
The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions
Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, C., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Salden, R. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.011 · Cited by 215
Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning.
King, A. (1999) · Cited by 208
Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of precision and subject generation
Stein, B. S., & Bransford, J. D. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90481-x · Cited by 184
Computer-Mediated Argumentative Interactions for the Co-Elaboration of Scientific Notions
Baker, M. J. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7_3 · Cited by 168
Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments
Marttunen, M. J., & Laurinen, L. I. (2001) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/a:1003931514884 · Cited by 108
A theory of inference generation during text comprehension
Graesser, A. C., & Kreuz, R. J. (1993) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539309544833 · Cited by 106
de Grave, W. S., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2001) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/a:1026571615672 · Cited by 94
Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology
Dönmez, P., Rosé, C. P., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1149293.1149310 · Cited by 92
Self-citationElaborating New Arguments Through a CSCL Script
Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7_8 · Cited by 91
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Stegmann, K. (2005) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.22318/cscl2005.717 · Cited by 72
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence in Education
Chan, L., Hogaboam, L., & Cao, R. (2022) · Applied innovation and technology management · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05740-3_17 · Cited by 62
Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Stegmann, K. (2005) · doi:10.3115/1149293.1149387 · Cited by 59
Self-citationWecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.001 · Cited by 47
Self-citationStrukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen
Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997) · Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) · doi:10.25656/01:7872 · Cited by 42
Litosseliti, L., Marttunen, M., Laurinen, L., & Salminen, T. (2005) · Education, Communication & Information · doi:10.1080/14636310500185877 · Cited by 16
Kuhn, D., & Goh, W. (2005) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1149293.1149338 · Cited by 13
S-COL: A Copernican turn for the development of flexibly reusable collaboration scripts
Wecker, C., Stegmann, K., Bernstein, F., Huber, M., Kalus, G., Kollar, I., Rathmayer, S., & Fischer, F. (2010) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9093-5 · Cited by 13
Self-citationContext Based Classification for Automatic Collaborative Learning Process Analysis
Wang, Y., Joshi, M., Rosé, C. P., Fischer, F., Weinberger, A., & Stegmann, K. (2007) · Cited by 5
Self-citationFischer, F., Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., & Kollar, I. (2011) · OPUS (Augsburg University) · doi:10.25656/01:8728 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school. In A. M. O’Donnel & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 117–149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748005 · Cited by 525
Self-citationNoroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006 · Cited by 310
Self-citationSocio-Cognitive Scaffolding with Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts: a Meta-Analysis
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7 · Cited by 278
Self-citationArgumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
Habernal, I., & Gurevych, I. (2016) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00276 · Cited by 272
Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D. W., & Fischer, F. (2018) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9292-z · Cited by 205
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Saarland University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Stegmann, Karsten
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2011-07-15
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297-323
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2103258272
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- collaborative argumentation, cognitive elaboration, computer-supported collaborative learning, online discourse, deep processing, argumentation instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review