Cited by 145Usability and User Interface DesignIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 200 of the 201 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: framework and formative methods

Paramythis, Alexandros, Weibelzahl, Stephan, Masthoff, Judith·2010·User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11257-010-9082-4

Cites

200 of 200 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Albrecht D., Zuckerman I.: Statistical and probabilistic methods for user modeling. Special issue User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 17(1–2), 1–215 (2007)
  2. Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D.: Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In: Workshop on the What, Who, Where, When, and How of Context-Awareness at CHI 2000, pp. 304–307. The Hague, The Netherlands (2000)
  3. Hoppe, H., Tauber, M., Ziegler, J.: A survey of models and formal description methods in HCI with example applications. In: ESPRIT Project, vol. 385 (1986)
  4. Jameson A.: Systems that Adapt to their Users: An Integrative Perspective. Saarland University, Saarbrücken (2001)
  5. Ohene-Djan, J.: Ownership transfer via personalisation as a value-adding strategy for web-based education. In: Workshop on Adaptive Systems for Web-Based Education at AH2002, pp. 27–41. Málaga, Spain (2002)
  6. O’Malley, C.E., Draper, S.W., Riley, M.S.: Constructive interaction: A method for studying Human–Computer-human interaction. In: 1st International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 269–274. Honolulu, HI (1984)
  7. Stary, C., Totter, A.: How to integrate concepts of the design and the evaluation of adaptable and adaptive user interfaces. In: 3rd ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All, pp. 68–75. Obernai, France (1997)
  8. Tobar, C.M.: Yet another evaluation framework. In: Workshop on Empirical Evaluation of Adaptive Systems at UM2003, pp. 15–24. Johnstown, PA (2003)
  9. van Barneveld, J., van Setten, M.: Involving users in the design of user interfaces for TV recommender systems. In: 3rd Workshop on Personalization in Future TV at UM03, Johnstown, PA (2003)
  10. Weibelzahl, S.: Evaluation of adaptive systems. PhD Thesis, University of Trier, Germany (2003)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 145

Metadata

Authors
Paramythis, A., Weibelzahl, S., & Masthoff, J.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
  • National College of Ireland (IE)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Paramythis, Alexandros
  • Weibelzahl, Stephan
  • Masthoff, Judith
Venue
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Published
2010-11-28
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
383-453
ISSN
  • 0924-1868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1391
OpenAlex
W2032468592
Cited by
145
References
201
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
21.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
adaptive systems, interactive systems, development life cycle, user modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review