Cited by 31Team Dynamics and PerformanceEmotion and Mood RecognitionIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Multimodal modeling of collaborative problem-solving facets in triads

Stewart, Angela E. B., Keirn, Zachary, D’Mello, Sidney K.·2021·User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11257-021-09290-y

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, A. E. B., Keirn, Z., & D’Mello, S. K.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Angela E. B.
Venue
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
713-751
ISSN
  • 0924-1868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1391
OpenAlex
W3126233671
Cited by
30
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (NSF DUE 1745442)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (IES R305A170432)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
collaborative problem solving, shared knowledge construction, remote collaboration, videoconferencing, visual programming, multimodal modeling, nonverbal cues, facial expressions, prosodic features, speech transcripts, real-time intervention, after action review

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review