The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It combines various sources of information, such as vision, language, depth data, lidar, and speech, to enhance the capability of scene semantic understanding [35,36,37].”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The architecture, benchmarked on the VOC Pascal Dataset 2007 and 2012 [29], exploited the Darknet framework for training.”
From YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant–A Comprehensive Review of YOLO (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most object detection models use generalpurpose datasets, such as COCO [12], ImageNet [13], and VOC [14]), where vehicle (i.e., cars) images are usually taken from a lateral or frontal view instead of a cenital plane.”
From T-YOLO: Tiny Vehicle Detection Based on YOLO and Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We comprehensively evaluate our method on the PASCAL VOC detection benchmarks [11] where RPNs with Fast R-CNNs produce detection accuracy better than the strong baseline of Selective Search with Fast R-CNNs.”
From Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks (2017) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For FSCIOD tasks, the data partitioning strategy by PerezRua et al. [62] is commonly used. This approach utilizes 20 classes overlapping with the PASCAL VOC dataset [63] as new incremental classes and the remaining 60 as base data. FSCIOD models under this setup are evaluated using K ∈ 1 , 5 , 10 bounding boxes per new class.”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The PASCAL Visual Object Classes (VOC) dataset, widely used for object detection tasks, includes 20 common object classes like people, animals, vehicles, and household items [63].”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, one one-stage approach has better ongoing execution exactness and speed on MS COCO and PASCAL VOC datasets [24,25].”
From Fusion of Deep Sort and Yolov5 for Effective Vehicle Detection and Tracking Scheme in Real-Time Traffic Management Sustainable System (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“To the best of our knowledge, for the evaluation of generic object detection algorithms, it is bounding boxes which are most widely used in the current literature (Everingham et al. 2010;Russakovsky et al. 2015), and therefore this is also the approach we adopt in this survey.”
From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Everingham et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“In practice, current detectors focus mainly on structured object categories, such as the 20, 200 and 91 object classes in PASCAL VOC (Everingham et al. 2010), ILSVRC (Russakovsky et al. 2015) and MS COCO (Lin et al. 2014) respectively.”
From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Everingham et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“PASCAL VOC Everingham et al. (2010, 2015) is a multiyear effort devoted to the creation and maintenance of a series of benchmark datasets for classification and object detection, creating the precedent for standardized evaluation of recognition algorithms in the form of annual competitions.”
From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Everingham et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“For generic object detection, there are four famous datasets: PASCAL VOC (Everingham et al. 2010(Everingham et al. , 2015)), ImageNet (Deng et al. 2009), MS COCO (Lin et al. 2014) and Open Images (Kuznetsova et al. 2018).”
From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Everingham et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“Current detection datasets (Everingham et al. 2010;Russakovsky et al. 2015;Lin et al. 2014) contain only a few dozen to hundreds of categories, significantly fewer than those which can be recognized by humans.”
From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Everingham et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“Likewise semantic labeling of pixels in a variety of scene types reaches performance levels of around 80% accuracy or more [74].”
From Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age (2016) · cites this paper as [74]
In the citing paper
“regions without bounding box annotations are simply considered as background during training in currently popular detection frameworks [18], [19]”
From IncDet: In Defense of Elastic Weight Consolidation for Incremental Object Detection (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Robust Real-Time Face Detection
Viola, P., & Jones, M. J. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000013087.49260.fb · Cited by 14,097
Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets
Demšar, J. (2006) · doi:10.5555/1248547.1248548 · Cited by 12,051
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval
Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 9,743
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms
Scharstein, D., & Szeliski, R. (2002) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1014573219977 · Cited by 6,740
Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos
Sivic, & Zisserman (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238663 · Cited by 6,367
Introduction to modern information retrieval
Dillon, M. (1983) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(83)90062-6 · Cited by 5,981
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) (1998). WordNet: an electronic lexical database. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–314 of 314
Machine Vision based Sample-Tube Localization for Mars Sample Return
Daftry, S., Ridge, B., Seto, W., Pham, T.-H., Ilhardt, P., Maggiolino, G., van der Merwe, M., Brinkman, A., Mayo, J., Kulczyski, E., et al. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100) · doi:10.1109/aero50100.2021.9438364 · Cited by 10
Vision to Language: Methods, Metrics and Datasets
Sharif, N., Nadeem, U., Shah, S. A. A., Bennamoun, M., & Liu, W. (2020) · Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49724-8_2 · Cited by 9
Estimating Labeling Quality with Deep Object Detectors
Haase-Schütz, C., Hertlein, H., & Wiesbeck, W. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2019.8814144 · Cited by 8
Sim-to-Real Transfer for Object Detection in Aerial Inspections of Transmission Towers
Peterlevitz, A. J., Chinelatto, M. A., Menezes, A. G., Motta, C. A. M., Pereira, G. A. B., Lopes, G. L., Souza, G. D. M., Rodrigues, J., Godoy, L. C., Koller, M. A. F. F., et al. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3322374 · Cited by 7
Li, C., Zhang, R., Wong, J., Gokmen, C., Srivastava, S., Martín-Martín, R., Wang, C., Levine, G., Ai, W., Martinez, B., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.09227 · Cited by 6
Idama, G., Guo, Y., & Yu, W. (2024) · 2024 33rd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN) · doi:10.1109/icccn61486.2024.10637599 · Cited by 5
Domain-Adaptive Online Active Learning for Real-Time Intelligent Video Analytics on Edge Devices
Boldo, M., De Marchi, M., Martini, E., Aldegheri, S., & Bombieri, N. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2024.3453188 · Cited by 4
Online continual streaming learning for embedded space applications
Mazouz, A. E., & Nguyen, V.-T. (2024) · Journal of Real-Time Image Processing · doi:10.1007/s11554-024-01438-4 · Cited by 3
Li, G., Zhang, G., & Qin, C. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21186100 · Cited by 2
Task-Specific Zero-Shot Quantization-Aware Training for Object Detection
Li, C., Chen, X., Wang, J., Zhao, K., & Chen, J. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.02123 · Cited by 2
Confidence Estimation for Object Detection in Document Images
Boillet, M., Kermorvant, C., & Paquet, T. (2022) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4109846 · Cited by 2
Hagiwara, Y., Fitch, K., & Trapp, M. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-64180-w
What Are We Actually Benchmarking in Robot Manipulation?
Jiang, T., Tan, X., Wheeler, S., Sun, L., Ayalew, T. W., & Walter, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.04233
Not All Labels Are Equal: Rationalizing The Labeling Costs for Training Object Detection
Elezi, I., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Leal-Taixe, L., & Alvarez, J. M. (2021) · arXiv · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Everingham, Mark
- Venue
- International Journal of Computer Vision
- Published
- 2009-09-09
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 303-338
- ISSN
- 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1405
- OpenAlex
- W2031489346
- Cited by
- 19,599
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1543 · 2025: 2006 · 2024: 2022 · 2023: 2109 · 2022: 2071 · 2021: 2130 · 2020: 1755 · 2019: 1514 · 2018: 1003 · 2017: 804 · 2016: 641 · 2015: 602 · 2014: 506 · 2013: 352 · 2012: 233
- FWCI
- 180.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- object detection, benchmark dataset, image annotation, evaluation procedures, object classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review