Cited by 186Mobile Learning in EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’ perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies

Hwang, Gwo-Jen, Lai, Chiu-Lin, Liang, Jyh-Chong, Chu, Hui-Chun, Tsai, Chin-Chung·2018·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-017-9540-3

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., Liang, J.-C., Chu, H.-C., & Tsai, C.-C.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
  • Soochow University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lai, Chiu-Lin
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2017-08-25
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
75-93
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2748220519
Cited by
186
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5
FWCI
13.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
mobile learning, high school students, student perceptions, peer interaction, higher-order thinking skills, adaptive content, collaboration, communication, problem solving, critical thinking, creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review