Cited by 35Artificial Intelligence in EducationOnline and Blended LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

ChatGPT-Enhanced Mobile Instant Messaging in Online Learning: Effects on Student Outcomes and Perceptions

Huang, Yueh-Min, Chen, Pei-Hua, Lee, Hsin-Yu, Sandnes, Frode Eika, Wu, Ting-Ting·2025·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108659

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, Y.-M., Chen, P.-H., Lee, H.-Y., Sandnes, F. E., & Wu, T.-T.
Affiliations
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
  • National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Corresponding author
Wu, Ting-Ting
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-07
Volume
168
Pages
108659
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409203443
Cited by
35
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 13
FWCI
36.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 112-2410-H-006-053-MY3, 113-2410-H-224-036-MY3, 113-2622-H-224-003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
ChatGPT, mobile instant messaging, online learning, student engagement, higher-order thinking skills, critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, technology acceptance, graduate students, online forums, cognitive load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review