Cited by 474Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsDigital Games and Media

The Role of Context in Online Gaming Excess and Addiction: Some Case Study Evidence

Griffiths, Mark D.·2010·International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11469-009-9229-x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffiths, M. D.
Affiliations
Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Griffiths, Mark D.
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Published
2009-07-07
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
119-125
ISSN
  • 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1882
OpenAlex
W1989630096
Cited by
474
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
45.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
online game addiction, excessive gaming, motivation, gaming time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review