Cited by 10Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Effectiveness of a Brief Group Intervention Program for Young Adults with Gaming-Related Problems

Open access
Männikkö, Niko, Mustonen, Terhi, Tanner, Niina, Vähänikkilä, Hannu, Kääriäinen, Maria·2022·International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Abstract

Excessive digital gaming can have unfavorable effects on gamers’ well-being and everyday functioning. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of a novel group intervention “Limitless Gaming Bootcamp” on (i) gaming disorder (GD) tendencies, (ii) the amount of time spent on leisure activities, and (iii) subjective well-being among Finnish young adults, and to determine the persistence of the intervention’s influence over time. A one-group pre- and post-test design with no control group was used. Thirty-seven participants were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were being between the ages of 18 and 29; self-reported excessive gaming; a willingness to get support in monitoring one’s gaming behaviour; and a fluency in Finnish. Participants completed a 10-session group intervention designed to enhance conscious gaming behavior and well-being. Baseline, post-test, and six month follow-up measurements were conducted to gather data. Variables measured included background variables, gaming disorder tendencies (Problematic Online Gaming Questionnaire, POGQ), self-reported time spent on various leisure activities, and subjective well-being (Short Form of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure, CORE-SF/A). The time spent on gaming decreased from pre- to post-intervention measurement and further to the six month follow-up, and participants exhibited less severe GD symptoms during the post-intervention phase and six months after the intervention. Gradual improvements in subjective well-being were also observed. The group intervention was found to be particularly effective at reducing the severity of GD symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11469-021-00559-2

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other approaches that have been tested in clinical trials for gaming disorder include motivational interviewing and counseling, family therapy, and psychosocial rehabilitation.

    “Other approaches that have been tested in clinical trials include motivational interviewing and counseling, family therapy, and psychosocial rehabilitation 204,216 .”

    From Emerging experience with selected new categories in the <scp>ICD</scp>‐11: complex <scp>PTSD</scp>, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [216]

    The paper’s background discussion (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) reports a systematic review covering family-based interventions and psychological or counseling programs for gaming disorder and Internet addiction. It does not identify motivational interviewing or psychosocial rehabilitation among those approaches, or establish that each listed approach was tested in a clinical trial. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sampogna, G., Del Vecchio, V., Luciano, M., Giallonardo, V., Palummo, C., Pocai, B., Steardo, L., Bhugra, D., & Fiorillo, A. (2018). Is Internet gaming disorder really a new form of mental disorder? A critical overview. Journal of Psychopathology.
  2. Vadlin, S., Åslund, C., Hellström, C., & Nilssons, K. W. (2016). Associations between problematic gaming and psychiatric symptoms among adolescents in two samples. Addictive Behaviors, 61, 8-15. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.001. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Männikkö, N., Mustonen, T., Tanner, N., Vähänikkilä, H., & Kääriäinen, M.
Affiliations
  • Oulu University of Applied Sciences (FI)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Männikkö, Niko
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Published
2021-06-14
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
2956-2972
ISSN
  • 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1882
OpenAlex
W3170142249
Cited by
10
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Juho Vainio Foundation (no)
  • Funding Centre for Social Welfare and Health Organisations (C 2822, 2017)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
gaming disorder, group intervention, young adults, subjective well-being, leisure, intervention effectiveness, follow-up outcomes, Finnish language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review