Cited by 244Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesReproductive Health and Contraception

Revisiting the duration of vasomotor symptoms of menopause: a meta-analysis

Open access
Politi, Mary C., Schleinitz, Mark D., Col, Nananda F.·2008·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Treatment decisions about menopause are predicated on a transient duration of vasomotor symptoms. However, evidence supporting a specific duration is weak.Objective To estimate the natural progression of vasomotor symptoms during the menopause transition by systematically compiling available evidence using meta-analytic techniques.Data sources We searched MEDLINE, hand searched secondary references in relevant studies, book chapters, and review papers, and contacted investigators about relevant published research.Review methods English language, population-based studies reporting vasomotor symptom prevalence among women in menopausal transition in time intervals based on years to or from final menstrual period were included. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of studies and extracted data for vasomotor symptom prevalence.Results The analyses included 10 studies (2 longitudinal, 8 cross sectional) with 35,445 participants. The percentage of women experiencing symptoms increased sharply in the 2 years before final menstrual period, peaked 1 year after final menstrual period, and did not return to premenopausal levels until about 8 years after final menstrual period. Nearly 50% of all women reported vasomotor symptoms 4 years after final menstrual period, and 10% of all women reported symptoms as far as 12 years after final menstrual period. When data were examined according to symptom severity ('any' vs. 'bothersome'), bothersome symptoms peaked about 1 year earlier and declined more rapidly than symptoms of any severity level.Conclusions Our findings suggest a median symptom duration of about 4 years among symptomatic women. A longer symptom duration may affect treatment decisions and clinical guidelines. Further prospective, longitudinal studies of menopausal symptoms should be conducted to confirm these results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-008-0655-4

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hot flashes occur in 60 to 80 % of women during the menopausal transition and persist for 4 to 5 years on average.

    “it is generally believed that hot flashes occur in 60 to 80 % of women during the menopausal transition [102] and persist for 4 to 5 years on average [103,104].”

    From Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Insomnia (2012) · cites this paper as [103]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Kronenberg F. Hot flashes: epidemiology and physiology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;592:52-86. discussion 123-33.
  2. Women's Health Initiative. Scientific Resources Website. Vol. 2006.
  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Executive Sum- mary. Hormone Therapy. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;104:1S.
  4. National Institute of Health. NIH State-of-the-Science conference on management of menopause-related symptoms. Vol. 2005; 2005.
  5. Kronenberg F. Hot Flashes. New York: Raven Press, Ltd.; 1994:97.
  6. Association for Healthcare Research and Quality. Evidence report/ Technology assessment: Management of menopause-related symptoms. Vol. 2005; 2005.
  7. Binfa L, Castelo-Branco C, Blumel JE, et al. Influence of psychosocial factors on climacteric symptoms. Maturitas. 2004;48:425-31.
  8. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283 (15):2008-20012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Politi, M. C., Schleinitz, M. D., & Col, N. F.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Politi, Mary C.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2008-06-03
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
1507-1513
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W1970386643
Cited by
244
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wake Forest University
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2r01hs013329-04a1, R01HS013329)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
vasomotor symptoms, menopause, perimenopause, symptom duration, hot flashes, final menstrual period, symptom prevalence
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Menopause, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Hot Flashes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review