Cited by 121Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Dyadic effects of fear of recurrence on the quality of life of cancer survivors and their caregivers

Kim, Youngmee, Carver, Charles S., Spillers, Rachel L., Love-Ghaffari, Melissa, Kaw, Chiew-Kwei·2012·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Background Although the 5 years cancer survival rate has increased to 66%, fear of cancer recurrence (FOR) continues to be a major concern for both cancer survivors and their family caregivers. It remains unknown, however, to what extent cancer severity is associated with the level of FOR reported by each individual in the survivor-caregiver dyad, which, in turn, is also associated with their quality of life (QOL).Method A total of 455 cancer survivor-caregiver dyads, who participated in national surveys targeting 2 years post-diagnosis, provided complete data for variables studied.Results Results of the Actor Partner Interdependence Model suggested that higher cancer severity was related to greater levels of FOR among both survivors and caregivers, which, in turn, was related to poorer QOL. Caregivers' FOR was related to survivors' poorer physical health. The associations between FOR and QOL were significant, above and beyond those of general anxiety.Conclusion Findings suggest that as expected, cancer severity was significantly related to individuals' FOR, which, in turn, played a key role in their mental health. Caregivers' FOR was also related to survivors' physical health, which suggests that programs aimed to manage FOR effectively should be provided not only to survivors but also caregivers, thereby improving the QOL of each person.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-011-9953-0

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y., Carver, C. S., Spillers, R. L., Love-Ghaffari, M., & Kaw, C.-K.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Youngmee
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2011-06-21
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
517-525
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2008089866
Cited by
121
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Cancer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
fear of cancer recurrence, cancer survivors, family caregivers, quality of life, cancer severity, dyadic effects, actor-partner interdependence, physical health, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Chi-Square Distribution, Caregivers, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review