Cited by 35HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Understanding Sustained Retention in HIV/AIDS Care and Treatment: a Synthetic Review

Roy, Monika, Czaicki, Nancy, Holmes, Charles, Chavan, Saurabh, Tsitsi, Apollo, Odeny, Thomas, Sikazwe, Izukanji, Padian, Nancy +1 more·2016·Current HIV/AIDS Reports

Abstract

Sustained retention represents an enduring and evolving challenge to HIV treatment programs in Africa. We present a theoretical framework for sustained retention borrowing from ecologic principles of sustainability and dynamic adaptation. We posit that sustained retention from the patient perspective is dependent on three foundational principles: (1) patient activation: the acceptance, prioritization, literacy, and skills to manage a chronic disease condition, (2) social normalization: the engagement of a social network and harnessing social capital to support care and treatment, and (3) livelihood routinization: the integration of care and treatment activities into livelihood priorities that may change over time. Using this framework, we highlight barriers specific to sustained retention and review interventions addressing long-term, sustained retention in HIV care with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11904-016-0317-9

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ability of an initiative to share resources with partners and other organisations, seek out alternative and supplemental resources and/or uncover multiple funding sources were highlighted across some approaches as important to overall sustainability.

    “The ability of an initiative to share resources with partners and other organisations [41, 46], seek out alternative and supplemental resources [18, 47–49] and/or uncover multiple funding sources [8, 36, 49, 50] were also highlighted across some approaches as important to overall sustainability.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roy, M., Czaicki, N., Holmes, C., Chavan, S., Tsitsi, A., Odeny, T., Sikazwe, I., Padian, N., & Geng, E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (ZM)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Roy, Monika
Venue
Current HIV/AIDS Reports
Published
2016-05-17
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
177-185
ISSN
  • 1548-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-3576
OpenAlex
W2407936191
Cited by
35
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current HIV/AIDS Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI007641)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
HIV/AIDS treatment, patient activation, social normalization, social capital, barriers to retention, sub-Saharan Africa, chronic disease management
MeSH terms
Appointments and Schedules, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Dropouts, Patient Participation, Policy Making, HIV Infections, Treatment Outcome, Africa South of the Sahara, Anti-HIV Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review