Cited by 105Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsMetabolism and Genetic DisordersNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments

Accuracy of recommended sampling and assay methods for the determination of plasma-free and urinary fractionated metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a systematic review

Open access
Därr, Roland, Kuhn, Matthias, Bode, Christoph, Bornstein, Stefan R., Pacak, Karel, Lenders, Jacques W.M., Eisenhofer, Graeme·2017·Endocrine

Abstract

Purpose To determine the accuracy of biochemical tests for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.Methods A search of the PubMed database was conducted for English-language articles published between October 1958 and December 2016 on the biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma using immunoassay methods or high-performance liquid chromatography with coulometric/electrochemical or tandem mass spectrometric detection for measurement of fractionated metanephrines in 24-h urine collections or plasma-free metanephrines obtained under seated or supine blood sampling conditions.Results Application of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Studies Accuracy Group criteria yielded 23 suitable articles. Summary receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed sensitivities/specificities of 94/93% and 91/93% for measurement of plasma-free metanephrines and urinary fractionated metanephrines using high-performance liquid chromatography or immunoassay methods, respectively. Partial areas under the curve were 0.947 vs. 0.911. Irrespective of the analytical method, sensitivity was significantly higher for supine compared with seated sampling, 95 vs. 89% (p < 0.02), while specificity was significantly higher for supine sampling compared with 24-h urine, 95 vs. 90% (p < 0.03). Partial areas under the curve were 0.942, 0.913, and 0.932 for supine sampling, seated sampling, and urine. Test accuracy increased linearly from 90 to 93% for 24-h urine at prevalence rates of 0.0-1.0, decreased linearly from 94 to 89% for seated sampling and was constant at 95% for supine conditions.Conclusions Current tests for the biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma show excellent diagnostic accuracy. Supine sampling conditions and measurement of plasma-free metanephrines using high-performance liquid chromatography with coulometric/electrochemical or tandem mass spectrometric detection provides the highest accuracy at all prevalence rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12020-017-1300-y

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plasma free or 24-hour urine fractionated metanephrines are recommended as the screening test of choice for pheochromocytoma with a sensitivity of 90% to 95%.

    “Plasma free or 24-hour urine fractionated metanephrines are recommended as the screening test of choice for pheochromocytoma with a sensitivity of 90% to 95% (202, 203).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [202]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Därr, R., Kuhn, M., Bode, C., Bornstein, S. R., Pacak, K., Lenders, J. W. M., & Eisenhofer, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Därr, Roland
Venue
Endocrine
Published
2017-04-12
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
495-503
ISSN
  • 0969-711X (ISSN-L)
  • 1355-008X
  • 1559-0100
OpenAlex
W2607207406
Cited by
105
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE) (DA 1630/2-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Keywords
pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, metanephrine, plasma free metanephrines, 24-hour urine collection, diagnostic accuracy, immunoassay, HPLC, tandem mass spectrometry, biochemical diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Humans, Metanephrine, Paraganglioma, Pheochromocytoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Specimen Handling, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review