Cited by 315Autophagy in Disease and TherapyHeat shock proteins researchCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism

Chaperone-mediated autophagy in aging and disease

Massey, Ashish C., Zhang, Cong, Cuervo, Ana Maria·2006·Current Topics in Developmental Biology

Abstract

Different mechanisms target intracellular components for their degradation into lysosomes through what is known as autophagy. In mammals, three main forms of autophagy have been described: macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). CMA is the only autophagic pathway that allows selective degradation of soluble proteins in lysosomes. In contrast to the other mammalian forms of autophagy, CMA does not require vesicle formation or major changes in the lysosomal membrane. Instead, substrate proteins directly cross the lysosomal membrane to reach the lumen, where they are rapidly degraded. The substrate proteins are targeted to the lysosomal membrane by recognition of a targeting motif (a KFERQ-like motif), by a chaperone complex, consisting of hsc70 and its cochaperones, in the cytoplasm. Once at the lysosomal membrane, the protein interacts with a lysosomal receptor for this pathway, lysosomal associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP-2A), and it is translocated across the membrane into the lysosomal lumen assisted by a lysosome resident chaperone. These two characteristics--selectivity and direct substrate translocation--determine the particular role of CMA in different physiological and pathological conditions. In this chapter, we cover current findings on the molecular mechanisms for CMA and the possible pathophysiological relevance of this selective lysosomal degradation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0070-2153(05)73007-6

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massey, A. C., Zhang, C., & Cuervo, A. M.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Current Topics in Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Volume
73
Pages
205-235
ISSN
0070-2153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1487064198
Cited by
315
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
96.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG019834, AG19834, AG-021904, T32AG023475)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
Keywords
chaperone-mediated autophagy, lysosomal degradation, selective protein degradation, Hsc70, LAMP2A, aging, disease, autophagy
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Autophagy, Disease, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Lysosomes, Oxidation-Reduction, Starvation, Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Antigen Presentation, Molecular Chaperones, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review