Cited by 54Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionCOVID-19 and Mental HealthCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Death anxiety, death reflection and interpersonal communication as predictors of social distance towards people infected with COVID 19

Open access
Curșeu, Petru Lucian, Coman, Andra Diana, Panchenko, Anton, Fodor, Oana Cătălina, Rațiu, Lucia·2023·Current Psychology

Abstract

Our study investigates several antecedents and consequences of negative emotional reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-national sample of 737 participants. Our results show that COVID-19 anxiety and negative mood are positively predicted by death anxiety and the use in communication of general COVID-19 information. Death reflection reduces negative mood in relation to COVID-19 and attenuates the positive association between death anxiety on the one hand and the negative mood and anxiety in relation to COVID-19 on the other hand. The use of humoristic information about COVID-19 reduces anxiety and social distance towards people infected with COVID-19 and also attenuates the positive association between the use in communication of general COVID-19 information and negative mood in relation to COVID-19. Our results also show that the association between death anxiety and social distance towards those infected with COVID-19 is mediated by anxiety and negative mood in relation to COVID-19. Finally, the association between the use of COVID-19 information in interpersonal communication and social distance is mediated by anxiety and negative mood in relation to COVID-19. The study thus reveals specific insights for tailored interventions to reduce negativity towards people infected with COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-020-01171-8

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three means by which humor buffers against death anxiety identified in this study are in line with previous studies indicating different coping strategies with death anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “These means of buffering against death anxiety are in line with previous studies, indicating different yet similarly intended coping strategies with death anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

    From When the times get tough the toughs get funny: Means by which humor buffers against death anxiety emerged during COVID-19 outbreak (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results (page not specified) show that death reflection weakens the association between death anxiety and COVID-19 anxiety or negative mood. The Discussion (page not specified) also describes humor in communication as a buffer against COVID-19 anxiety. The paper does not establish that humor specifically buffers death anxiety or identify three such means; those details are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Research also shows that social connection, achievement, and religion all played an important role in warding off death anxiety caused by the pandemic.

    “Research also shows that social connection, achievement, and religion all played an important role in warding off death anxiety caused by the pandemic [62].”

    From When the times get tough the toughs get funny: Means by which humor buffers against death anxiety emerged during COVID-19 outbreak (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Discussion says death reflection alleviated the link between death anxiety and COVID-19 anxiety, and that humor in communication buffered anxiety related to the virus. The Methods describe ‘connection to others’ as one dimension of a death-reflection scale, but no passage found says social connection, achievement, or religion warded off death anxiety; searches for those terms and related wording did not establish the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Belmi P Pfeffer J Power and death: Mortality salience increases power seeking while feeling powerful reduces death anxiety Journal of Applied Psychology 2016 101 5 702 720 10.1037/apl0000076 26867106 · DOI
  2. Bhattacharyya P Jena LK Pradhan S Resilience as a mediator between workplace humour and well-being at work: An enquiry on the healthcare professionals Journal of Health Management 2019 21 1 160 176 10.1177/0972063418821815 · DOI
  3. Broudy R Brondolo E Coakley V Brady N Cassells A Tobin JN Sweeney M Perceived ethnic discrimination in relation to daily moods and negative social interactions Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2007 30 1 31 43 10.1007/s10865-006-9081-4 17091223 · DOI
  4. Cheung F Lucas RE Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples Quality of Life Research 2014 23 10 2809 2818 10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4 24890827 PMC4221492 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Clissold E Nylander D Watson C Ventriglio A Pandemics and prejudice International Journal of Social Psychiatry 2020 66 421 423 10.1177/0020764020937873 32586168 · DOI
  6. Cohen J A power primer Psychological Bulletin 1992 112 1 155 159 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 19565683 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Curran, T., Janovecm A. & Olsen, K. (2021) Making others laugh is the best medicine: humor orientation, health outcomes, and the moderating role of cognitive flexibility. Health Communication, 36(4), 468–475. 10.1080/10410236.2019.1700438. 31818148 · DOI
  8. Curşeu PL Stoop R Schalk R Prejudice toward immigrant workers among Dutch employees: Integrated threat theory revisited European Journal of Social Psychology 2007 37 1 125 140 10.1002/ejsp.331 · DOI
  9. Evans MG A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1985 36 305 323 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0 · DOI
  10. Feingold A Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis Psychological Bulletin 1994 116 3 429 456 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429 7809307 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Florian V Mikulincer M Fear of death and the judgment of social transgressions: A multidimensional test of terror management theory Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997 73 2 369 380 10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.369 9248054 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ford TE Ford BL Boxer CF Armstrong J Effect of humor on state anxiety and math performance Humor 2012 25 1 59 74 10.1515/humor-2012-0004 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Greenberg J Kosloff S Terror management theory: Implications for understanding prejudice, stereotyping, intergroup conflict, and political attitudes Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2008 2 5 1881 1894 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00144.x · DOI
  14. Kirkman BL Chen G Maximizing your data or data slicing? Recommendations for managing multiple submissions from the same dataset Management and Organization Review 2011 7 3 433 446 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00228.x · DOI
  15. Lambert AJ Eadeh FR Peak SA Scherer LD Schott JP Slochower JM Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the mortality salience manipulation: Revisiting the “affect-free” claim of terror management research Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2014 106 5 655 678 10.1037/a0036353 24749817 · DOI
  16. Lazarus RS Emotion and adaptation 1991 Oxford Oxford University Press
  17. Li S Wang Y Xue J Zhao N Zhu T The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: A study on active Weibo users International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020 17 6 2032 10.3390/ijerph17062032 32204411 PMC7143846 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lynch OH Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research Communication Theory 2002 12 4 423 445 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277.x · DOI
  19. Mather DM Jones SW Moats S Improving upon Bogardus: Creating a more sensitive and dynamic social distance scale Survey Practice 2017 10 4 1 10 10.29115/SP-2017-0026 · DOI
  20. McLean CP Anderson ER Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety Clinical Psychology Review 2009 29 6 496 505 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.05.003 19541399 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Nabi RL Laughing in the face of fear (of disease detection): Using humor to promote cancer self-examination behavior Health Communication 2016 31 7 873 883 10.1080/10410236.2014.1000479 26652312 · DOI
  22. Pettigrew CG Dawson JG Death anxiety: “State” or “trait”? Journal of Clinical Psychology 1979 35 1 154 158 10.1002/1097-4679(197901)35:1<154::AID-JCLP2270350125>3.0.CO;2-E 422719 · DOI
  23. Podsakoff PM MacKenzie SB Podsakoff NP Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it Annual Review of Psychology 2011 63 1 31 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 21838546 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pyszczynski T Greenberg J Solomon S A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory Psychological Review 1999 106 4 835 845 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835 10560330 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Randler C Wüst-Ackermann P Demirhan E Humor reduces anxiety and disgust in anticipation of an educational dissection in teacher students International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2016 11 4 421 432
  26. Reed AE Chan L Mikels JA Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information Psychology and Aging 2014 29 1 1 15 10.1037/a0035194 24660792 · DOI
  27. Romero EJ Cruthirds KW The use of humor in the workplace Academy of Management Perspectives 2006 20 2 58 69 10.5465/amp.2006.20591005 · DOI
  28. Schmukle SC Egloff B Does the implicit association test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance? European Journal of Personality 2004 18 6 483 494 10.1002/per.525 · DOI
  29. Schneider M Voracek M Tran US “A joke a day keeps the doctor away?” meta-analytical evidence of differential associations of habitual humor styles with mental health Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2018 59 3 289 300 10.1111/sjop.12432 29431190 · DOI
  30. Schwarz N Clore GL Mood as information: 20 years later Psychological Inquiry 2003 14 3–4 296 303 10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_20 · DOI
  31. Sechrist GB Swim JK Mark MM Mood as information in making attributions to discrimination Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003 29 4 524 531 10.1177/0146167202250922 15273005 · DOI
  32. Siemsen E Roth A Oliveira P Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects Organizational Research Methods 2010 13 3 456 476 10.1177/1094428109351241 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Sliter MT Sinclair RR Yuan Z Mohr CD Don’t fear the reaper: Trait death anxiety, mortality salience, and occupational health Journal of Applied Psychology 2014 99 4 759 769 10.1037/a0035729 24490968 · DOI
  34. Sorokowski, P., Groyecka, A., Kowal, M., Sorokowska, A., Białek, M., Lebuda, I., Zdybek, P., & Karwowski, M. (2020). Can information about pandemics increase negative attitudes toward foreign groups? A case of COVID-19 outbreak. Sustainability, 12, 4912. 10.3390/su12124912. · DOI
  35. Wang C Pan R Wan X Tan Y Xu L Ho CS Ho RC Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020 17 5 1729 10.3390/ijerph17051729 32155789 PMC7084952 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Wanous JP Reichers AE Hudy MJ Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology 1997 82 2 247 252 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247 9109282 · DOI
  37. Wark C Galliher JF Emory Bogardus and the origins of the social distance scale The American Sociologist 2007 38 4 383 395 10.1007/s12108-007-9023-9 · DOI
  38. Yuan Z Baranik LE Sinclair RR Sliter MT Rand KL Salyers MP Memento Mori: The development and validation of the death reflection scale Journal of Organizational Behavior 2019 40 4 417 433 10.1002/job.2339 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curșeu, P. L., Coman, A. D., Panchenko, A., Fodor, O. C., & Rațiu, L.
Affiliations
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Corresponding author
Curșeu, Petru Lucian
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2021-03-04
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
1490-1503
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W3133881165
Cited by
54
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10
FWCI
9.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
fear of death, COVID-19 pandemic, social distance, interpersonal communication, COVID-19 information, humor, negative mood, COVID-19 anxiety, stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review