Cited by 41COVID-19 and Mental HealthLong-Term Effects of COVID-19COVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Effects of restraining measures due to COVID-19: Pre- and post-lockdown cognitive status and mental health

Open access
Nogueira, Joana, Gerardo, Bianca, Silva, Ana Rita, Pinto, Paula, Barbosa, Rosa, Soares, Sílvia, Baptista, Beatriz, Paquete, Carolina +4 more·2022·Current Psychology

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted all countries to adopt restraining measures to mitigate the spread of the disease. Usually, large-scale disasters tend to be accompanied by significant increases of psychological distress, depression and anxiety. Confinement measures imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to have similar consequences. In the present study we aim to evaluate how COVID-19 affected the overall psychological functioning of Portuguese individuals by providing a comparison of current data with status prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study sample was composed of 150 cognitively healthy participants. Results show an overall maintenance of cognitive capacities, although subjective cognitive decline complaints significantly increased during the pandemic. Regarding mental health, restraining measures culminated in an aggravation of depressive and decrease of the perceived quality of life, associated with feelings of loneliness and perceived social isolation. Finally, higher levels of pre-COVID-19 quality of life seem to play a protective role against depression and anxiety and predict less difficulties in emotion regulation, feelings of solitude and cognitive complaints. In sum, confinement due to COVID-19 implied an aggravation of the mental health of the Portuguese population, which appears to have been attenuated in those with higher pre-pandemic levels of perceived quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-021-01747-y

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher pre-COVID quality of life acts as a protective factor against anxiety during the pandemic in non-clinical populations.

    “Interestingly, higher levels of pre-COVID QOL acted as a protective factor against anxiety during the pandemic in non-clinical populations [92–94].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Barreto, J., Leuschner, A., Santos, F., & Sobral, M. (2008). Escala de Depressão Geriátrica. In Grupo de Estudos de Envelhecimento Cerebral e Demência (Ed.), Escalas e Testes na Demência (pp. 69- 72). Lisboa: Novartis.
  2. Bosco, A., Caffò, A. O., Spano, G., Lopez, A. (2020). Beyond the cut- offs: A Bayesian approach to the use of MoCA as a screening tool for MCI and Dementia. V. R. Preedy & C. R. Martin (Eds.), The Neuroscience of Dementia: Diagnosis and Management. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-815854-8.
  3. Coutinho, J., Ribeiro, E., Ferreirinha, R., & Dias, P. (2010). The Portuguese version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale and its relationship with psychopathological symptoms. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 37(4), 145-151.
  4. Wechsler, D. (2008). Escala de Inteligência de Wechsler para Adultos - Terceira edição (WAIS-III) [Wechsler adult intelligence scale-third edition]. Cegoc, Portugal.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nogueira, J., Gerardo, B., Silva, A. R., Pinto, P., Barbosa, R., Soares, S., Baptista, B., Paquete, C., Cabral-Pinto, M., Vilar, M. M., Simões, M. R., & Freitas, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
Corresponding author
Freitas, Sandra
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2021-04-21
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
7383-7392
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W3156391391
Cited by
41
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/136029/2018, IF/01325/2015, SFRH/BD/146680/2019, RESEARCH4COVID 19 (1st edition))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Keywords
COVID-19 lockdown, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, subjective quality of life, loneliness, social isolation, subjective cognitive decline, emotion regulation, cognitive function, protective factors, Portuguese population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review