Cited by 32Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesWomen's cancer prevention and management

History of Major Depressive Disorder Prospectively Predicts Worse Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer

Open access
Jim, Heather S. L., Small, Brent J., Minton, Susan, Andrykowski, Michael, Jacobsen, Paul B.·2012·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data are scarce about whether past history of major depressive disorder in the absence of current depression places breast cancer patients at risk for worse quality of life. PURPOSE: The current study prospectively examined quality of life during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with a history of resolved major depressive disorder (n = 29) and no history of depression (n = 144). METHODS: Women with Stages 0-II breast cancer were assessed prior to and at the completion of chemotherapy. Major depressive disorder was assessed via structured interview and quality of life with the SF-36. RESULTS: Patients with past major depressive disorder displayed greater declines in physical functioning relative to patients with no history of depression (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that breast cancer patients with a history of resolved major depressive disorder are at increased risk for declines in physical functioning during chemotherapy relative to patients with no history of depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-011-9333-6

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jim, H. S. L., Small, B. J., Minton, S., Andrykowski, M., & Jacobsen, P. B.
Affiliations
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Jim, Heather S. L.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2011-12-14
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
402-408
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2007280301
Cited by
32
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K07CA138499, R01CA082822)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
major depressive disorder, breast cancer, quality of life, physical function, chemotherapy, history of depression, women, SF-36
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast Neoplasms, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review