Cited by 15Stress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Altered Neuronal Activity in the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala Induced by Restraint Water-Immersion Stress in Rats

Open access
He, Feng, Ai, Hongbin, Wang, Min, Wang, Xiusong, Geng, Xiwen·2018·Neuroscience Bulletin

Abstract

Restraint water-immersion stress (RWIS), a compound stress model, has been widely used to induce acute gastric ulceration in rats. A wealth of evidence suggests that the central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA) is a focal region for mediating the biological response to stress. Different stressors induce distinct alterations of neuronal activity in the CEA; however, few studies have reported the characteristics of CEA neuronal activity induced by RWIS. Therefore, we explored this issue using immunohistochemistry and in vivo extracellular single-unit recording. Our results showed that RWIS and restraint stress (RS) differentially changed the c-Fos expression and firing properties of neurons in the medial CEA. In addition, RWIS, but not RS, induced the activation of corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons in the CEA. These findings suggested that specific neuronal activation in the CEA is involved in the formation of RWIS-induced gastric ulcers. This study also provides a possible theoretical explanation for the different gastric dysfunctions induced by different stressors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12264-018-0282-y

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, F., Ai, H., Wang, M., Wang, X., & Geng, X.
Affiliations
  • Shandong Normal University (CN)
  • Qilu University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Feng
Venue
Neuroscience Bulletin
Published
2018-08-31
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1067-1076
ISSN
  • 1995-8218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1673-7067
OpenAlex
W2889133039
Cited by
15
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81501149, 31571104)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
restraint stress, central amygdala, gastric ulcer, Fos expression, corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons, neuronal firing properties
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Disease Models, Animal, Gastric Mucosa, Gene Expression Regulation, Neurons, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Rats, Wistar, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Rats, Central Amygdaloid Nucleus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review