Cited by 498Gastrointestinal motility and disordersVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Brainstem circuits regulating gastric function

Open access
Travagli, R. Alberto, Hermann, Gerlinda E., Browning, Kirsteen N., Rogers, Richard C.·2006·Annual Review of Physiology

Abstract

Brainstem parasympathetic circuits that modulate digestive functions of the stomach are comprised of afferent vagal fibers, neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), and the efferent fibers originating in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV). A large body of evidence has shown that neuronal communications between the NTS and the DMV are plastic and are regulated by the presence of a variety of neurotransmitters and circulating hormones as well as the presence, or absence, of afferent input to the NTS. These data suggest that descending central nervous system inputs as well as hormonal and afferent feedback resulting from the digestive process can powerfully regulate vago-vagal reflex sensitivity. This paper first reviews the essential "static" organization and function of vago-vagal gastric control neurocircuitry. We then present data on the opioidergic modulation of NTS connections with the DMV as an example of the "gating" of these reflexes, i.e., how neurotransmitters, hormones, and vagal afferent traffic can make an otherwise static autonomic reflex highly plastic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040504.094635

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lesions and impaired circuits in the brainstem can alter gastric motor function by interrupting parasympathetic pathways, including vagal afferent fibers, neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarii, and preganglionic efferents arising from the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus.

    “Lesions and impaired circuits in the brainstem can alter gastric motor function by interrupting parasympathetic pathways, including vagal afferent fibers, neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS), and preganglionic efferents arising from the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV) (Travagli et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Travagli, R. A., Hermann, G. E., Browning, K. N., & Rogers, R. C.
Affiliations
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Physiology
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
279-305
ISSN
  • 0066-4278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1585
OpenAlex
W2131361751
Cited by
498
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 31
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK56373, DK- 55530, DK-52142, R01DK052142, R01DK055530, R01DK056373)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
brainstem, gastric function, vago-vagal reflex, nucleus tractus solitarius, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, vagal afferents, opioid modulation, hormonal regulation, gastric motility
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Stem, Humans, Nerve Net, Stomach, Vagus Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review