Cited by 197Social Robot Interaction and HRIEthics and Social Impacts of AIAI in Service Interactions

Fear of Autonomous Robots and Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from National Representative Data with Probability Sampling

Liang, Yuhua, Lee, Seungcheol Austin·2017·International Journal of Social Robotics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12369-017-0401-3

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, Y., & Lee, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Chapman University (US)
  • Northern Kentucky University (US)
Corresponding author
Liang, Yuhua
Venue
International Journal of Social Robotics
Published
2017-03-08
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
379-384
ISSN
  • 1875-4791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-4805
OpenAlex
W2592721812
Cited by
197
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Social Robotics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
artificial intelligence, robot acceptance, loneliness, unemployment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review