The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
A Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1411 · Cited by 1,766 · cited 2×
“static visual arrays and scenes have received a lot of attention (see [3, 4] for reviews), but very little is known about how we”
BackgroundFrom eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball
Land, M. F., & McLeod, P. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81887 · Cited by 725
Summation and Division by Neurons in Primate Visual Cortex
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8191289 · Cited by 649 · cited 1×
“Such normalization of feature values is supported by neurobiological evidence of the non-linear single-cell behavior in the primary visual cortex [70].”
MethodAbrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not
Theeuwes, J. (1995) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213269 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Revisiting Video Saliency: A Large-Scale Benchmark and a New Model
Wang, W., Shen, J., Guo, F., Cheng, M.-M., & Borji, A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00514 · Cited by 268
Wass, S. V., Smith, T. J., & Johnson, M. H. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0245-6 · Cited by 154
Self-citationWass, S. V., & Smith, T. J. (2014) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12049 · Cited by 83
Self-citationWilliams, L. H., & Drew, T. (2019) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-019-0171-6 · Cited by 48
Shot scale matters: The effect of close-up frequency on mental state attribution in film viewers
Bálint, K. E., Blessing, J. N., & Rooney, B. (2020) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101480 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Mital, P. K., Smith, T. J., Hill, R. L., & Henderson, J. M.
- Venue
- Cognitive Computation
- Published
- 2010-10-22
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-24
- ISSN
- 1866-9956 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-9964
- OpenAlex
- W2119577735
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12559-010-9074-z
- The paper
- Mital, P. K., Smith, T. J., Hill, R. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2011). Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion. Cognitive Computation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-010-9074-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
