Cited by 17Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutPolicing Practices and Perceptions

Moderating Role of Work Support in Stressor–Burnout Relationship: An Empirical Investigation Among Police Personnel in India

Kumar, Vaijayanthee, Kamalanabhan, T. J.·2017·Psychological Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12646-017-0383-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, V., & Kamalanabhan, T. J.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Vaijayanthee
Venue
Psychological Studies
Published
2017-02-14
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
85-97
ISSN
  • 0033-2968 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-9861
OpenAlex
W2587889565
Cited by
17
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
burnout, police officers, occupational stress, workplace support, moderating effect, work-home interface, organizational stressors, police stress, protective factors, Indian police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review