Cited by 174Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Mindfulness: First Steps Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Mindfulness Scale

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-012-0102-9

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bergomi, C. (2007). Achtsamkeit, buddhistische Meditation und psychische Gesundheit (Unpublished master’s thesis). Psychology Department, University of Bern, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.upd.unibe.ch/research/papers/Liz_Bergomi.pdf .
  2. Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: the development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1, 11–34.
  3. Hough, L. M., & Schneider, R. J. (1995). Personality traits, taxonomies, and applications in organizations. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individuals and behavior in organizations (pp. 31–88). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis, Springer series in statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
  5. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive behavioral therapy of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Bergomi, Claudia
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2012-04-15
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
18-32
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2173168888
Cited by
173
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness assessment, factor structure, meditation experience, mindfulness-based stress reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review